Physician and patient : $b or, a practical view of the mutual duties, relations and interests of the medical profession and the communityHooker, Worthington
Science
Physician and patient : $b or, a practical view of the mutual duties, relations and interests of the medical profession and the community
Hooker, Worthington
Medical ethics; Physician and patient; Physicians; Quacks and quackery
The science of medicine is so much a mystery to the common observer,
that he cannot, as you have already seen, apply his tests to a direct
examination of the physician’s knowledge. He is not competent to make
the estimate in this way; and if he is not aware of this, he will
certainly be deceived. If he wishes effectually to avoid error, he
must apply a touchstone which he himself understands, and not one of
which he is profoundly ignorant. What is this touchstone? Plainly
this. _Let him observe the mental qualities of the physician, as they
are exhibited in regard to any subject, with which he is himself
familiar in common with the physician_; and he has here a test upon
which he may rely with absolute certainty. He discovers in this way
the character of the physician’s mind; and it is just to infer that
the mental qualities thus laid open to view, stamp their impress upon
the practice of his profession, and give to it its character. No
change comes over his mind when he passes from other subjects to that
of medicine. The same mental powers are there, and he will observe,
think reason, and act, just as you have seen him do in regard to
common subjects.
Take an illustration from surgery. You see a surgeon set a fractured
limb. You cannot judge whether he does it skilfully, because you
do not understand how it should be done, so as to bring the broken
ends accurately together, and keep them so. But if that surgeon,
in passing your house, by some accident breaks the thill of his
carriage, you can watch him as he splices the thill, and you can
judge, for you are competent to do so, whether he exhibits mechanical
talent in the operation. If he does, you can safely infer that the
same mechanical talent will be brought into exercise in setting a
bone, and that he will set it as skilfully as he spliced the thill.
Other talents in a medical man can be tested in a similar manner.
The truth, of which I have given this single illustration, is so
obvious when plainly stated that it hardly needs to be dwelt upon at
all; and yet, it is so often disregarded by the community, in the
estimates which are made of physicians, that it may be profitable to
illustrate it somewhat at large. In doing this we shall accomplish
another important purpose—we shall obtain a clear view of those
qualities which are most necessary in the particular calling of a
physician.
Let us then cursorily notice some prominent characteristics, as they
are seen in physicians in your daily intercourse with them on common
subjects, and apply the criterion which we have under consideration.
Look at the mode in which physicians form their opinions.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account