Physician and patient : $b or, a practical view of the mutual duties, relations and interests of the medical profession and the communityHooker, Worthington
Science
Physician and patient : $b or, a practical view of the mutual duties, relations and interests of the medical profession and the community
Hooker, Worthington
Medical ethics; Physician and patient; Physicians; Quacks and quackery
This ought not so to be. The public should, one and all, feel that
they are personally interested in upholding a well-educated medical
profession. Here is a science which is confessedly difficult above
all others, and in which, as you have seen, careless observation
is peculiarly liable to error. How important then, that those who
take charge of your health, your life, should be careful and skilful
observers. And education is obviously as much needed to form good
habits of observation in this, as it is in other sciences. But let me
say, that whenever you give countenance to quackery, whether it be in
the shape of a secret nostrum, or a fashionable system, you strike a
blow at the standard of medical education. You in effect say to the
physician, observe, watch, study as much as you will, we esteem all
your labor and experience vain. When men of wisdom and influence do
thus, as I am sorry to say they often do, it certainly casts contempt
upon education, and therefore tends to lower its standard in the
profession. For if physicians see, that they can acquire the esteem
of the public without study and labor, many will be disposed to give
them up, and take the easier path to success, into which they are
thus invited. And this is the grand reason, why so many pretenders
are found in the ranks of the medical profession.
Before I leave this topic let me correct one error, which is quite
prevalent in regard to the basis of our organizations. We are charged
with being proscriptive in regard to opinions. We are called in
vulgar cant _regulars_, and we are supposed to have ‘regular’ systems
of doctrine and practice, and to maintain a deadly hostility to
any opinion which is opposed to these systems. This may be true of
individuals, but it is not true of the great body of the profession.
We allow of the utmost latitude of belief. We have no creed, nor sets
of creeds. We thrust none out of our medical societies for opinion’s
sake. Any member may adopt any doctrine or system he pleases, however
much opposed to the opinions of the great majority—Homœopathy,
Hydropathy, or even Thompsonism. Education is the qualification
for admission to our ranks; and nothing but a gross and obstinate
infraction of our rules of intercourse, which are based upon truth
and honor and benevolence, can be made the ground of expulsion.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account