Physician and patient : $b or, a practical view of the mutual duties, relations and interests of the medical profession and the communityHooker, Worthington
Science
Physician and patient : $b or, a practical view of the mutual duties, relations and interests of the medical profession and the community
Hooker, Worthington
Medical ethics; Physician and patient; Physicians; Quacks and quackery
Let me not be understood to claim, that the merits of physicians
should not be canvassed at all by the community. There should be
freedom of opinion upon this subject; and, when it will accomplish
any good purpose, there should be freedom also in expressing that
opinion. But the opinions of those who are ignorant of the subjects
to which they relate, and who are not in possession of the facts
in the case, ought at least to be uttered with some degree of
modesty, and a mere blind preference is no justification of the bold
opinionating, and the busy interference, which are so common with the
train of zealous partizans, which some physicians draw after them.
Some in their zeal carry their interference even into the chamber
of the sick, and disturb its quiet with debates in regard to the
propriety of the practice which is pursued. To say nothing of the
evil resulting from the excitement thus produced, the influence of
the physician over the mind of the patient, which, as you will see in
another chapter, is sometimes of great importance, is often destroyed
in this way. Hope is as real a cordial to the sick as any restorative
medicine that can be given. And the meddler, who attempts to destroy
the confidence of a patient in his physician, and thus take from him
the hope that he will be relieved by his skill, does as cruel an act
as if he entered the sick room and snatched from the very lips of the
enfeebled, languishing, and perhaps dying man, the cordial draught
which was to revive him.
Some are zealous in their recommendation of medicines to the sick,
and perhaps even urge the patient to take them without the knowledge
of the attending physician. Such meddlers have no scruples in
regard to this interference with the physician’s course, so long
as the responsibility of the case remains upon his hands; but the
moment that it is proposed to them to take the responsibility upon
themselves, they shrink from it, notwithstanding the confidence and
earnestness with which they urge the use of their favorite remedies.
It is amusing to see what various, and even opposite measures are
recommended by different persons in the same case. The friends of a
patient, who are anxious that everything should be done to save a
life so valuable and dear to them, are often perplexed and troubled
by the great variety of remedies urged upon them, and the plausible
reasons, and the asserted cures, upon which these recommendations
are based. And not a little firmness is required to resist the
importunity of these meddlers, especially as it is often prompted
by undoubted kindness. But the welfare of the patient demands it,
and no fear of giving offence should hinder from pursuing the proper
course. The adequate remedy in such circumstances is to thank such
meddlers for their kindness, and tell them that the measures which
they recommend shall be mentioned to the physician, and, if he thinks
proper, they shall be used.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account