Physician and patient : $b or, a practical view of the mutual duties, relations and interests of the medical profession and the communityHooker, Worthington
Science
Physician and patient : $b or, a practical view of the mutual duties, relations and interests of the medical profession and the community
Hooker, Worthington
Medical ethics; Physician and patient; Physicians; Quacks and quackery
We speak of the brain as the seat of the mind, or soul. If we mean
by this simply, that this is the great central organ of that system
in the body (the nervous system) through which the mind acts upon
external things, and is acted upon by them, it is correct so to
speak. But if we mean to localize the mind, as sitting there, and
especially if we fix upon some one part of the brain, as Descartes
did upon the pineal gland (a body smaller than a pea) as the seat,
the throne of the mind, the illustration is an erroneous one. The
mind acts upon the whole body, through all the parts of the nervous
system, and each portion of that system has its own peculiar offices
to perform in obedience to the mind. This is as true of the brain as
it is of the rest of the nervous system. This organ is a complex one,
and the different parts have their different offices. This we know
in regard to some of these parts, and we can justly presume it in
regard to others. And we do this without adopting the fanciful ideas
of phrenologists in locating the different faculties of the mind.
While the brain is the great central organ of the nervous system,
by which the mind imparts and receives impressions, there are other
parts of that same system which seem to bear some other relation
to the mind than that by which they transmit these impressions to
and from the mind through the brain, as the nerves ordinarily do.
They seem to have a connection with the mind independent of the
direct agency of the brain, and for aught we know they have such
a connection. When the mind is affected by any passion, either of
the cheerful or the depressing kind, its sensible effects upon the
body are not observable chiefly in the brain, but in the region of
the heart and the other organs adjacent to it. The thrill of joy is
felt there, and grief produces there its sensation of oppression,
prompting the occasional sigh to relieve it.
Such facts as these led an eminent French physiologist, Bichat, to
adopt the theory, that while the intellectual functions have their
seat in the brain, the moral sentiments have theirs in the ganglionic
system of nerves, (as it is called,) which has certain great nervous
centres in the region of the heart, stomach, &c.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account