Physician and patient : $b or, a practical view of the mutual duties, relations and interests of the medical profession and the communityHooker, Worthington
Science
Physician and patient : $b or, a practical view of the mutual duties, relations and interests of the medical profession and the community
Hooker, Worthington
Medical ethics; Physician and patient; Physicians; Quacks and quackery
One circumstance, that makes the intercourse of the physician with
his patients familiar and intimate, which I have as yet barely hinted
at, merits a more particular notice. I refer to the sympathy which
he has felt with them in their seasons of suffering, anxiety, and
affliction. It has sometimes been said, that the physician, from his
familiarity with scenes of distress, becomes unfeeling, and incapable
of sympathizing with others. This may be true of him, if he from the
first look at the sufferings of his fellow-men only as a source of
emolument to himself. If at the onset he enthrones this perfectly
selfish and therefore hardening principle in his bosom, he will of
course become devoid of sympathy and benevolence. But if he does
not this strange violence to his natural sympathies, but lets them
flow out, as he goes forth on his daily errands of relief and mercy
to high and low, to rich and poor, and especially if he be faithful
to the poor who can give him nothing but their blessing and their
prayers, his sympathy and kindness will be so often drawn out, and
under such a variety of circumstances, that they will become more
tender and active, instead of being blunted and repressed. True, he
will not have that mawkish sensibility which vents itself in tears,
and sighs, and expressions of pity, but stops short of action, or,
if it ever reaches forth its hand, does it but fitfully, and with
none of that steadiness so essential in giving relief and support
to soul or body in its feebleness and suffering. If he ever had any
of such romantic and unpractical sensibility, he has cast it off
in his actual service in the fields of benevolence, into which his
profession has necessarily led him. He has learned over and over,
the lesson of _active_ sympathy. He has learned it often under
circumstances of discouragement, and sometimes without even the show
of gratitude being offered to him. He has learned it, I am glad to
say, (and I say it with some tender recollections,) with signs of
gratitude in his patients, which are not to be mistaken—with the
blessing of those who were ready to perish, but who were saved by
his timely and persevering exertions. He may appear to the casual
observer to have merged the feelings of the man in those of the
physician—to have surrendered his humanity to the cold and stern
demands of science. He may seem to be devoid of sympathy, as he goes
to work midst scenes of suffering, without a tear, or even a sigh,
performing his duties with an unblanched face, a cool and collected
air, and a steady hand, while all around are full of fear, and
trembling, and pity. Yet there _is_ sympathy in his bosom, but it
is _active_. It vents itself in the right way—in doing. There _is_
feeling there. It is not destroyed, but its manifestations are _under
control_. It is from this power of control which he has acquired,
that the physician or surgeon may appear to others to be utterly
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account