Physician and patient : $b or, a practical view of the mutual duties, relations and interests of the medical profession and the communityHooker, Worthington
Science
Physician and patient : $b or, a practical view of the mutual duties, relations and interests of the medical profession and the community
Hooker, Worthington
Medical ethics; Physician and patient; Physicians; Quacks and quackery
No one then has better and more various opportunities for studying
human character than the physician: and he adds every day from this
source to the storehouse of his experience. I need not spend time to
prove, that this knowledge of character thus acquired confers upon
him a means of influence which he otherwise could not have. It not
only gives him a tact in influencing men generally; but in individual
cases, the revelations of thought and feeling which he has witnessed
at the fireside or in the sick room, made in the free and unguarded
moment, under the application of faithful tests, afford him such an
insight into the character, that he knows just what chord to strike,
to produce the effect which he desires. He needs not to feel his way
to the heart. He has already learned it. He knows just what motives
will act with the most certainty, and needs not to make any random
experiments.
What responsibility then rests upon the physician! How careful should
he be in the expression of his opinions! At what high ends should he
aim in his daily example! How important that he should be right upon
the great moral questions which agitate the community, and that his
morality should be strictly that of the Bible!
Too often is it the case, that the physician, who professes to
be governed by principle, exerts no such commanding influence,
as his relations to his fellow men enable him to do; but, as a
matter of policy, avoids committing himself decidedly and openly
upon those subjects which occasion any diversity of opinion in
the community. Those who thus for selfish ends fail to meet the
full responsibilities of their station, do not, indeed, like the
unprincipled, undertake to please everybody (a contemptible course,
and commonly a profitless one) but they at least make it a main
point to displease no one. In so doing, it is true, they make no
direct attack upon principle, and inflict no positive injury upon the
moral interests of society; but they are guilty of a sacrifice of
principle, and they neglect to do the good which it is in their power
to do. Suffice it to say, that while the physician should not court
opposition by any needless attacks upon the opinions and prejudices
of others, for this would impair his usefulness, a dignified and firm
expression of his sentiments, and a decided influence for good upon
every great moral question, we have a right to expect from one who
has so great a share, as the physician necessarily has, in moulding
the character of society.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account