Physician and patient : $b or, a practical view of the mutual duties, relations and interests of the medical profession and the communityHooker, Worthington
Science
Physician and patient : $b or, a practical view of the mutual duties, relations and interests of the medical profession and the community
Hooker, Worthington
Medical ethics; Physician and patient; Physicians; Quacks and quackery
The above remarks have been made, it will be seen, in regard to acute
diseases only, and they apply to but a very limited extent to cases
of _chronic_ disease. During the lingering days, and weeks, and
sometimes months, of such cases, there are many opportunities for
exerting an influence upon the sick. And while it is true, that the
physician should adhere to the general rule, which I have stated in
regard to the effect of hope, it is his duty, and especially is it
the duty of the friends, to improve the opportunities which present
for the best good of the patient. And here let me say, that it is not
the formal and stately conversation, the professional sermonizing,
so often made use of, which is really the most effectual; but it is
the word dropped from day to day, with a spirit not roused up for
the occasion, but breathing forth naturally and easily—it is the
instruction suggested by events of daily occurrence, or by remarks
which are dropped in common conversation, and accompanied by the
affectionate appeal, when it is seen that the proper chord can be
struck—this is the kind of influence, which is brought to bear most
decidedly upon the moral and religious character of the sick man. It
is this that will enter his heart; while the arrows, which are duly
heralded by the note of preparation, will fall to the ground, warded
off by the shields which he raises against them.
Injudicious attempts are sometimes made to influence the sick, both
with regard to their temporal, and their eternal interests. I will
cite but a single case in illustration. It is a case which was
reported by the late Dr. Hale of Boston, in his work on Spotted
Fever. Although the patient was so sick, that Dr. H. considered it
of the utmost importance that he should be kept quiet, and gave the
most positive and authoritative injunctions to this effect, yet a
friend, to whom the proper adjustment of the sick man’s affairs,
if his sickness was to end in death, was a matter of considerable
interest, persisted in harrassing him on this subject. The result was
an alarming increase of the disease. The symptoms were afterward,
however, so much mitigated, as to give some ground for hope of a
recovery. As his mind was clear and rational when he came out of his
stupor, “his attendant with a very benevolent but mistaken zeal,
thought it more important to improve this opportunity in taking
care of his soul’s health, than in administering the remedies which
had been prescribed; and, instead of giving the medicines with care
and attention, and promoting his rest and quietness, as he ought
to have done, and had been strictly enjoined to do, he spent the
whole time in talking, and exciting him to talk, of his hopes and
prospects beyond the grave.” This conversation was continued for
about two hours, and then the patient sank back into a stupor, a
state of collapse which was caused by the previous excitement, and
he never awoke. If the quietness enjoined by the physician had been
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account