Physician and patient : $b or, a practical view of the mutual duties, relations and interests of the medical profession and the communityHooker, Worthington
Science
Physician and patient : $b or, a practical view of the mutual duties, relations and interests of the medical profession and the community
Hooker, Worthington
Medical ethics; Physician and patient; Physicians; Quacks and quackery
Assuming, for the moment, that the duties and qualifications of
the medical practitioner do not impose upon him a higher degree of
responsibility, relative to the spiritual good of his patient, than
attaches to every other well-informed Christian, in reference to
his neighbor, I may safely assert that the profession of medicine
does in no wise release its member from a duty common to all
Christians—that of embracing every opportunity to testify their
gratitude to the adorable Saviour, and their anxious desire to
extend the blessings of redeeming mercy to those who “are ready to
perish.” But the assumption itself is incorrect; for it would not
be difficult to prove that the favorable opportunities and peculiar
facilities possessed by the physician do proportionably _augment_
his responsibility, and the consequent amount of obligation. Nor can
this fearful responsibility be evaded, by a general impression of our
unfitness for the task, unless we can conscientiously affirm that we
have tried to the utmost—that we have done all that we were able to
do.
As regards the alleged interference with the ministerial office,
I may truly say that, to the extent of my own observation, the
apprehension is entirely groundless. So far removed, indeed,
are the judicious, well-timed suggestions of the physician, in
relation to the immortal interests of his patient, from anything
like interference with the sacred function, that, in the instances
in which they are most needed, they may be strictly regarded as
_precursory_ and introductory to the more direct instructions of the
minister; as opening a way for him which would otherwise be closed,
as removing ill-founded objections to his assistance, and enkindling
a desire for his spiritual counsel. In many other instances, the
Christian physician proves a powerful _auxiliary_ to the faithful
minister of Christ, especially by facilitating his visits, pointing
out at what time, under what circumstances, and to what extent,
the patient may be likely to attend, with safety and advantage, to
“the things which make for his eternal peace.” I have good reason,
indeed, to believe that the enlightened ambassadors of the Saviour,
so far from entertaining a feeling of jealousy, do really hail with
cordial satisfaction such auxiliaries, in their trying visits to the
bed of sickness and death; persuaded that none can feel a deeper
interest than a Christian physician, in the well-being of _the whole
man_, bodily and spiritually, in reference to eternity as well as to
time. And how can jealousy be felt? Is not the glory of his Divine
Master in the salvation of immortal souls, the supreme object of
every pious minister’s pursuit? If so, even the feeblest attempt to
subserve the same cause must gain his hearty concurrence. Happily,
the un-scriptural, un-Protestant notion of religious instruction
devolving exclusively on the clergy has become obsolete. As well
might the Bible itself be read and studied by them alone. The very
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account