Physician and patient : $b or, a practical view of the mutual duties, relations and interests of the medical profession and the communityHooker, Worthington
Science
Physician and patient : $b or, a practical view of the mutual duties, relations and interests of the medical profession and the community
Hooker, Worthington
Medical ethics; Physician and patient; Physicians; Quacks and quackery
These successive changes in popular remedies show, that the public
have always been egregiously mistaken, whenever they have attributed
to them such wonderful efficacy. Else the very high and extensive
reputation gained by each could not have been so utterly lost in so
short a time. If, for instance, a tithe of the fame of the Hygeian
pills was well founded, the thousands of mouths that swallowed them
would not have been, as they were almost in a twelvemonth, just as
wide open to receive the magic pills of Brandreth. Either a large
portion of the community have committed a great error, in ascribing
such marvellous efficacy to these remedies; or they have committed a
greater one in so soon discarding them. Either the one or the other
of these errors has been committed, in regard to each one of the most
popular remedies, that have succeeded each other in the favor of the
public, from time immemorial—not one that has not had its _decline_,
as well as its _rise_, and its _acme_. And what is remarkable is,
that when once a remedy has thoroughly passed from the popular favor,
no matter how great its fame has been, it never can be revived again,
unless it be under an entirely new name, and with new pretensions.
Why? Because it has been tried, and its reputation was found to be a
splendid bubble that has burst and fallen. And the public, like the
child, when a bubble has burst, has done with that one forever, and
busies itself at once in raising another, which, in its turn, is
succeeded by another, and so on to the end, if end there be, which
seems to be hardly a possibility with the bubbles of quackery.
FOOTNOTES:
[4] Many varieties of weapon-ointment were used. Some of the articles
in them which were considered most essential were powder of mummy,
human blood, and moss from the skull of a thief hung in chains.
It is a humiliating fact in the history of human wisdom, that Lord
Bacon, the wisest man of his time, could only say of the pretended
efficacy of this ointment, that he, himself, “as yet, is not fully
inclined to believe it.”
[5] The popular disposition to look to some one remedy for a disease,
is seen in the conversations in every circle at the present time,
in regard to the cholera. The inquiry is for some one specific
remedy,—and physicians are constantly asked if something has not yet
been discovered of this character. Though the newspapers are filled
with new and _certain_ cures, no _new_ remedy has been discovered for
this disease since its former visitation in this country. Physicians
do however know better how to treat it, than they did then; but
it is only because experience has taught them better _how_ to use
the appropriate remedies, and not because any very important new
medicines are added to the list of those which are applicable to this
disease.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account