Physician and patient : $b or, a practical view of the mutual duties, relations and interests of the medical profession and the communityHooker, Worthington
Science
Physician and patient : $b or, a practical view of the mutual duties, relations and interests of the medical profession and the community
Hooker, Worthington
Medical ethics; Physician and patient; Physicians; Quacks and quackery
Such is the statement of the _principles_ of Thompson’s theory. The
_principle_ contained in the last sentence, touching the sale of
family rights, was the favorite one, the _golden_ one in his eyes,
and he fought for it manfully. He made no blunder in putting this
among the _principles_ of his _practice_.
Appended to this ‘statement’ are some ‘Remarks on Fevers,’ which it
is not necessary to copy entire.
“No person,” says Dr. Thompson, “ever yet died of a fever! for as
death approaches, the patient grows cold, until in death the last
spark is extinguished. This the learned doctors cannot deny; and
as this is true, they ought in justice to acknowledge that their
whole train of depletive remedies, such as bleeding, blistering,
physicking, starving, with all their refrigeratives; their opium,
mercury, arsenic, antimony, nitre, &c., are so many deadly engines
combined with the disease, against the constitution and life of the
patient. If cold, which is the commonly received opinion, (and which
is true,) is the cause of fever, to repeatedly bleed the patient, and
administer mercury, opium, nitre, and other refrigerants, to restore
him to health, is, as though a man should, to increase a fire in
his room, throw a part of it out of the house, and to increase the
remainder, put on water, snow and ice!”
And again—“There is no more difference in all cases of fever than
what is caused by the different degrees of cold, or loss of inward
heat, which are two adverse parties in one body contending for power.
If the heat gains the victory, the cold will be disinherited, and
health will be restored; but on the other hand, if cold gains the
ascendancy, heat will be dispossessed of its empire, and death will
follow of course.
“The higher the fever runs, the sooner will the cold be subdued; and
if you contend against the heat, the longer will be the run of the
fever, and when extinguished, death follows.”
When a patient dies of fever, Thompson says, “the question whether
the heat or the cold killed the patient is easily decided, for that
power which bears rule in the body after death, is what killed the
patient, which is cold—as much as that which bears rule when he is
alive, is heat.”
Again he says, “At the commencement of a fever, by direct and proper
application of suitable medicine, it can be easily and speedily
removed. Twenty-four, or forty-eight hours, to the extent, are
sufficient, and often short of that time, the fever may be removed.”
Now see how confident this bold reformer is in the truth of these
assertions. “These declarations,” says he, “are true, and have been
often proved, and can be again, to the satisfaction of every candid
person AT THE HAZARD OF ANY FORFEITURE THE FACULTY MAY CHALLENGE.”
I have but a remark or two to make upon this theory of Dr. Thompson.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account