Physician and patient : $b or, a practical view of the mutual duties, relations and interests of the medical profession and the communityHooker, Worthington
Science
Physician and patient : $b or, a practical view of the mutual duties, relations and interests of the medical profession and the community
Hooker, Worthington
Medical ethics; Physician and patient; Physicians; Quacks and quackery
Thompsonians have made much use of the popular prejudice against
_mineral_ medicines. This prejudice has arisen in part from the
evils which have been seen to result from the _abuse_ of calomel.
This remedy is so effectual an one in many diseases, that it has
been used more freely, and with less caution, than it should be; and
disastrous effects have sometimes followed this abuse of it. But the
same reasoning which prohibits the cautious use of this article, on
account of the results which come from its incautious use, would
prohibit the use of horses, fire, steam, &c., because, through
carelessness and want of skill, horses run away, conflagrations take
place, and steam boilers burst. Still this groundless reasoning
is applied by a large portion of the community to this remedy.
And this prejudice against calomel has been extended to mineral
medicines generally. So extensive is this prejudice, that the quack
of every name is sure to appeal to it, and he, therefore, puts in
his advertisement, the assurance that his medicine is ‘entirely
vegetable,’ as a necessary passport to public favor. Many physicians,
too, disgracefully yield to the prejudice of the people in this
respect. They pretend to give no calomel, or almost none of it; and
yet, such physicians generally give more of this article, than those
who pursue an open and manly course on this subject.
In the clamor which has been raised against ‘mineral doctors’
Thompsonians have been among the loudest. They uniformly speak of
minerals, as if they were deleterious _because_ they are minerals.
Their chemistry, which, as you have seen, recognizes the existence of
only four elements, has not, I suppose, taught them, that their own
bodies are partly composed of minerals, that there is lime in the
bones, and iron in the blood, that minerals exist in many articles of
food, that their good wives sometimes put a mineral of even deadly
power into the bread which they eat, and that they daily use as a
condiment one of these same luckless minerals. They speak of ‘mineral
doctors’ as the poisoners of the race, while they claim so perfect a
safety in the use of their _vegetable_ remedies, that no carelessness
or want of skill can make them produce any bad results.
There seems to be a quite a general impression abroad in the
community, that there is a _harmlessness_ in vegetable remedies that
does not attach to mineral medicines, and that their effects are of a
_less abiding_ character. Nothing can be more untrue. Let us look for
a moment at these two points.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account