Physiological Researches on Life and DeathBichat, Xavier
Science
Physiological Researches on Life and Death
Bichat, Xavier
Death (Biology); Life (Biology)
[31] The contractility in the different organs in which we can
observe it does not exhibit characters so striking as those which
Bichat here assigns to it, and the motions which he ranks in
the same class have the greatest differences among them. To be
convinced how little justice there is in this division, it will
be sufficient to trace the progress of the food, along its whole
course, to the interior of the digestive canal. The first act
which is presented to our observation is entirely voluntary; this
is mastication; the act which follows it is not so completely so.
Deglutition in fact can sometimes take place against the will, if a
body of a proper consistence is at the entrance of the pharynx. We
have but an imperfect control over the muscles of the uvula and the
velum palati, if we wish to move these parts separately; we have
perhaps less power still over the contraction of the muscles of the
pharynx, though they do not appear to differ from the locomotive
muscles, either in their symmetry, or in the arrangement and colour
of their fibres, or in the nerves which they receive; nor finally
do they differ in the sudden, instantaneous contraction, wholly
different from the slow contraction, the vermicular motion of the
stomach and intestines.
After having passed the pharynx, the alimentary mass enters the
œsophagus. The motions are there still under the influence of the
nerves; but they are not at all under the influence of the will.
The muscular layer which produces them has not the appearance,
the red colour of the voluntary muscles; but it still preserves
something of the sudden motion of their contraction. Hence we see,
that the motions of the œsophagus cannot be ranked either among the
motions of organic life, since they cease by the division of the
nerves, or among those of animal life, as they are not under the
influence of the will. It is remarkable also that Bichat, who, in
this and the following paragraph, announces the characters of the
different kinds of contractility, does not speak of the œsophagus,
whilst he offers as an example the motions of the bladder, the
heart, the stomach and the intestines.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account