Physiology: The Science of the BodyMartin, Ernest G.
Science
Physiology: The Science of the Body
Martin, Ernest G.
Physiology
even the cleverest paintings do not give an impression of depth equal to
that which comes from actually looking at solid objects. This is because
of help we get from the two eyes in the latter case. The reason for the
difference is that when we look at a solid object with both eyes the
view we get with one eye is not exactly the same as with the other; we
see a little farther around on the left side with the left eye, and on
the right side with the right eye. The combined view with the two eyes
gives us an impression of solidity that cannot possibly be had when the
view with the two eyes is exactly the same, as when we look at a
picture. The only way in which the impression of depth can really be
gotten in a picture is by using the familiar method of the stereoscope,
where two pictures are taken simultaneously by two cameras, placed a
little farther apart than the two eyes; and then the two are looked at
together through a special pair of prisms.
By means of the three distance senses, smell, hearing, and sight, we are
informed pretty completely as to what is around us. All three give an
idea as to the direction from us of objects; although sight does this
better than either of the others. Sight, also, lets us know accurately
as to the distance away of objects, provided they are fairly near. Smell
and hearing, as well as sight, may give us some idea as to the distance
of far objects, but only when we are dealing with familiar sensations. A
very faint smell, or faint sound, means a distant object provided we
know enough about the source to know that if the object were near the
sensations would be keener. Our judgment of distant objects by sight is
better than this, but not by any means perfect. When we contrast the
distance senses with the contact senses we see at once that the great
advantage coming from the possession of distance senses is in the time
that is permitted for action. In the chapter on contact senses we
emphasized the fact that the response to them must be immediate; there
is no time to pick and choose. When we can learn of the presence of
objects before they reach us, and something of their direction and
distance as well, we can usually take time to select the most fitting
course of action. We do not have to jump into a mud puddle to escape an
automobile if we see it soon enough. We shall learn in a later chapter
how this opportunity of choice is wrapped up with our development into
highly intelligent animals.
CHAPTER X
THE NERVOUS SYSTEM AND SIMPLE NERVOUS ACTIONS
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account