Pictorial history of the war for the Union, volume 1 (of 2) : $b A complete and reliable history of the war from its commencement to its close ... together with a complete chronological analysis of the warStephens, Ann S. (Ann Sophia)
History
Pictorial history of the war for the Union, volume 1 (of 2) : $b A complete and reliable history of the war from its commencement to its close ... together with a complete chronological analysis of the war
Stephens, Ann S. (Ann Sophia)
United States -- History -- Civil War, 1861-1865
There have been rumors of great cruelty on the battle-field after the
fight was over—of men prowling like fiends among the dead, and murdering
the wounded; but these things should be thrice proven before we believe
them of American citizens. Rumor is always triple-tongued, and human
nature does not become demoniac in a single hour. One thing is certain,
many an act of merciful kindness was performed that night, which an
honest pen should prefer to record. Certain it is that Southern soldiers
in many instances shared their water—the most precious thing they
had—with the wounded Union men. A soldier passing over the field found
two wounded combatants lying together—one was a New Yorker, the other a
Georgian. The poor wounded fellow from New York cried out piteously for
water, and the Georgian, gathering up his strength, called out: “For
God’s sake give him drink; for I called on a New York man for water when
his column was in retreat, and he ran to the trench at the risk of his
life and brought it to me!”
One brave young enemy lost his life after passing through all the perils
of the battle, in attempting to procure drink for his wounded foes.
If there were individual instances of cruelty on either side, and this
is possible—let us remember that there was kindness too; and when the
day shall come—God grant it may be quickly—when we are one people again,
let the cruelty be forgiven and the kindness only remembered.
And now our record of the battle of Bull Run is at an end. It was
valiantly contended on both sides, and won only from superior numbers
and reinforcements of fresh troops, poured upon the exhausted soldiery
of the Union. To gain this contest the South sent her best and very
bravest generals. Her forces were led by Beauregard and Johnston, both
experienced officers. They were also cheered by the near presence of
Jefferson Davis, who came upon the field when the victory was assured,
amid the shouts of a soldiery, the more enthusiastic because they had
just been rescued from almost certain defeat. They had the choice of
position and had fortified it with wonderful skill; a thorough knowledge
of the country, and troops unwearied by long marches—indeed, the
advantages were altogether on their side. The North, never dreaming that
an open rebellion would break out, was utterly dependant on
undisciplined troops; while the South, having premeditated resistance to
the Government, had been drilling men for months, if not years. There
was no one point except in the actual bravery of their leaders and
soldiers in which the enemy was not superior to the Union forces. In
personal valor the Southerners themselves have never claimed to surpass
that exhibited in this battle by their foes.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account