Pictorial history of the war for the Union, volume 1 (of 2) : $b A complete and reliable history of the war from its commencement to its close ... together with a complete chronological analysis of the warStephens, Ann S. (Ann Sophia)
History
Pictorial history of the war for the Union, volume 1 (of 2) : $b A complete and reliable history of the war from its commencement to its close ... together with a complete chronological analysis of the war
Stephens, Ann S. (Ann Sophia)
United States -- History -- Civil War, 1861-1865
Very soon the Government formed a new department, consisting of Ohio,
Indiana, and that part of Kentucky within a commanding distance of
Cincinnati, placing it under the charge of General Mitchell, in order to
relieve General Rosecranz in Western Virginia and General Anderson of a
part of their responsibility, and enable them to give greater attention
to their own specific departments. The department under General Anderson
seemed to require similar military discipline to that of Annapolis and
Maryland, and, as a commencement, Martin W. Barr, the telegraphic news
reporter of the Southern Associated Press, the medium for the
transmission of correspondence from traitors at the North to rebels in
the South, was arrested, together with ex-Governor Morehead and Reuben
T. Murrett, one of the proprietors of the _Courier_, a rebel sheet.
[Illustration: UNION HEROES FOOTE. GOLDSBOROUGH. FARRAGUT. STRINGHAM.
PORTER.]
The State had now become a portion of the ground which was to be so
fiercely contested. Rebel journals and leaders made no concealment of
their purpose to wrest Kentucky from the Union at every hazard. The Ohio
river was to be the boundary of the Southern empire, and notwithstanding
the emphatic voice of her people, all the energy of the combined forces
of the rebel armies were to be brought to bear upon the work. The fact
could be no longer disguised from the people, and the loyal men, finding
that their patience and confidence in the disloyal portion, with their
previous consent to a negative position of neutrality, were in vain,
boldly declared that the time had come to arouse and resist the
impending ruin. The attempt of the conspirators of the Cotton States to
make Kentucky the battle-field, along with Virginia, was to be defeated
at every cost, and the people, rising to a comprehension of their
responsibility, hastened to the work of organization and defence.
Among the loyal men of the State to whom the highest honor is due for
their bold and stirring advocacy of the Union, and for the most summary
measures which patriotism and honor could dictate, were Hon. JOSEPH
HOLT, and Hon. LOVELL S. ROUSSEAU, of the State Senate, and the gifted
divine, R. J. Breckinridge, D.D.
NAVAL OPERATIONS.
At the commencement of hostilities the Government was unprepared to meet
the naval requirements incident to the contest which had so suddenly
been forced upon it. The necessity of a stringent blockade of the entire
southern coast had become apparent; while the protection and supply of
the naval stations in the rebel States still in possession of our
forces, and the recapture of those which had been seized, required a
navy vastly greater than that at the command of the Government; and no
time was lost in preparing as far as practicable to meet this emergency.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account