Pictorial history of the war for the Union, volume 1 (of 2) : $b A complete and reliable history of the war from its commencement to its close ... together with a complete chronological analysis of the warStephens, Ann S. (Ann Sophia)
History
Pictorial history of the war for the Union, volume 1 (of 2) : $b A complete and reliable history of the war from its commencement to its close ... together with a complete chronological analysis of the war
Stephens, Ann S. (Ann Sophia)
United States -- History -- Civil War, 1861-1865
He also ordered that all carriages bearing the enemy’s flag should be
seized and confiscated; and that women resorting to the neighborhood of
the military prison and insulting the Federal troops, or communicating
with prisoners by exhibiting and waving secession flags, should be
imprisoned. Disloyal persons who, under the military rules, were liable
to assessment for the support of loyal fugitives from their homes,
should be compelled to pay their assessment. All persons of every rank
or position, violating the laws, or interfering with their execution,
should be dealt with under strict penalties.
This energetic administration had the desired effect; and the violent
minority who were determined, at every hazard, to plunge the State into
war, were restrained, and order and peace assured and restored.
THE STONE FLEET.
Notwithstanding all the activity and watchfulness of the blockading
vessels off the Southern coast, many instances were exultingly heralded
by the Southern press, as well as in Europe, of the successful running
of the blockade by vessels bound both outward and inward. The logic of
these occurrences was very simple on the part of the secessionists and
their sympathizers. The frequent evasion of the blockade proved that it
was “inefficient” on the part of the Federal government, and therefore
not only to be disregarded, but officially declared by foreign
governments to be incomplete, and practically null and void. This
declaration was expected to be sufficient to warrant the free movements
of commerce, and any attempt to interfere on the part of the United
States would be a challenge for the intervention of England and France.
The repeated instances of vessels escaping rendered it an imperative
necessity for the government to adopt some measure that would, if
possible, prevent their recurrence at the principal ports of the South.
For this purpose it was determined to close several of the harbors by
placing obstructions in the channels. Most of the harbors of the
Southern coast, in consequence of the deltas, and numerous islands at
their entrances, have several channels, through which vessels of light
draft may pass, while those of the heaviest draft are confined to one
principal channel. This is the case in the approach to both Charleston
and Savannah. The obstructing of these two principal channels was
therefore assigned for the month of December.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account