Pictorial history of the war for the Union, volume 1 (of 2) : $b A complete and reliable history of the war from its commencement to its close ... together with a complete chronological analysis of the warStephens, Ann S. (Ann Sophia)
History
Pictorial history of the war for the Union, volume 1 (of 2) : $b A complete and reliable history of the war from its commencement to its close ... together with a complete chronological analysis of the war
Stephens, Ann S. (Ann Sophia)
United States -- History -- Civil War, 1861-1865
The position of Missouri was similar to that of Kentucky. The State
endeavored to avoid taking part in the war. Troops had been organized
with hostile designs against the Government. These were forced to
surrender by Captain Lyon, (afterward appointed General). At St. Louis
an attack was made by the populace, on the 10th of May, upon the United
States volunteers; they returned the fire, killing some twenty; an
_émeute_ on the next day resulted in the loss of several lives. General
Harney, who had been put in command of this district, entered into an
agreement with the State authorities, that was disapproved by the
Government, and he relieved from the command, which was then given to
General Lyon.
The attitude assumed by the great powers of Europe in relation to the
American war was important. That of England, indicated by the royal
proclamation issued on the 14th of May a determination to maintain a
strict neutrality in the contest between the contending parties. The
proclamation went on to forbid all British subjects from taking part in
any way in the contest, by enlisting in the army or navy of either
party; by fitting out or arming any vessel; by breaking any lawfully
established blockade, or carrying to either, troops or any articles
contraband of war. This proclamation, taken in connection with the
explanations of the Ministers and the speeches in Parliament, had an
unfriendly aspect toward the United States, recognizing, as it did, the
Confederate States as belligerents, and, by implication, entitled
equally to the right of carrying prizes into the ports of Great Britain.
In the House of Commons, Lord John Russell said that the character of
belligerency was not so much a principle as a fact; that a certain
amount of force and consistency acquired by any mass of population
engaged in war entitled them to be treated as a belligerent. A power or
a community which was at war with another, and which covered the sea
with its cruizers, must either be acknowledged as a belligerent or dealt
with as a pirate. The Government had come to the opinion that the
Southern Confederacy, according to those principles which were
considered just, must be treated as belligerent. In this critical
condition was the country when the Government prepared to advance its
armies into Virginia.
OCCUPATION OF ALEXANDRIA, Va.
ASSASSINATION OF COLONEL ELLSWORTH.
MAY 24, 1861.
The defenders of the Union had been gathering at Washington and in its
vicinity for more than a month, in answer to the call for troops, that
rang through the land clear as clarion notes. The arduous labor of
providing for and disciplining the large number of untrained recruits,
collected in such haste, had been met with energy and perseverance by
the officers of the government. Very much had been accomplished,
notwithstanding all the embarrassments incident to an extensive and
untried field of labor.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account