Pictorial history of the war for the Union, volume 2 (of 2) : $b A complete and reliable history of the war from its commencement to its close ... together with a complete chronological analysis of the warStephens, Ann S. (Ann Sophia)
History
Pictorial history of the war for the Union, volume 2 (of 2) : $b A complete and reliable history of the war from its commencement to its close ... together with a complete chronological analysis of the war
Stephens, Ann S. (Ann Sophia)
United States -- History -- Civil War, 1861-1865
We will now turn our attention to a brilliant engagement which occurred
simultaneously with the fall of Vicksburg. The town of Helena, in
Arkansas, had been garrisoned by a small force under General Prentiss, a
gallant officer, who had been captured at Pittsburg Landing with a large
portion of his division, after bravely contending for more than half a
day with a foe quadruple his own force.
THE BATTLE AT HELENA, ARKANSAS.
JULY 4, 1863.
The town of Helena, in Arkansas, is situated upon the northern bank of
the Mississippi river, and lies upon flat ground. Not more than a
quarter of a mile from the river the city and its approaches are
commanded by high ridges, between which are ravines opening toward the
river. The city had been strongly fortified by batteries placed upon
these hills and connected in line by rifle-pits.
An attack upon Helena had been anticipated for some days, and at four
o’clock on the morning of the 4th of July, the attack was opened upon
General Prentiss by a rebel force numbering fifteen thousand, under
Generals Holmes and Price. The Union forces, who had been two nights
under arms and waiting the attack, were in readiness in a few minutes,
and infantry, cavalry, and artillery were immediately in the positions
assigned them. Between the ridges and the river the low, flat ground was
protected by cavalry and rifle-pits and flanking batteries of
ten-pounder Parrotts, and six and twelve-pounder brass pieces. Making
the city the base of operations, Battery A was placed upon the right,
and Batteries B, C, and D, upon the left. The enemy attacked upon the
left of the line, and were opposed by a strong force of cavalry, with a
brigade of infantry and four pieces of artillery. Presently it was
reported that a large force was assaulting Battery A; and close upon the
heels of this intelligence came the news that sharpshooters were
harassing batteries C and D; behind the sharpshooters came heavy columns
of the enemy who were rapidly moving artillery into position. In front
of Battery B could be seen a large force of cavalry, showing that the
enemy had been disposed by the planning of a master mind. The enemy
opened a spirited fire on both flanks of General Prentiss’ troops at
once, but without producing any effect; evidently no great result was
expected by the rebels in regard to this movement, and it was merely
intended as a diversion while they were throwing their whole strength
against the Union centre. This plan would, if successfully carried out,
have given them possession of Fort Curtis, a point which was centrally
located, and commanded all the ridges surrounding the city. But the
rebels were not aware of the presence at the city’s landing of the
gunboat Tyler, commanded by Lieutenant James M. Pritchett, and they were
equally astonished and disconcerted when, at a critical moment, the
Tyler made them aware of her presence. The enemy were unable to open
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account