Pirate tales from the lawHarris, Arthur M. (Arthur Merton)
History
Pirate tales from the law
Harris, Arthur M. (Arthur Merton)
Pirates
Bowen steered from Rajapore down along the Malabar coast until he came
to Cochin, a Portuguese settlement and where a miscalled Portuguese
war fleet made its anchorage. Those old sieves were the local maritime
joke, and a brisk pirate would think little of using them for mooring
buoys. This aggregation had once gone out after the formidable Captain
Kidd and much to its surprise and pain had found him. It had never
been known to attempt anything notable since. Certainly, they did not
trouble John Bowen. As Bowen dawdled along in these parts, touching at
this and that small port for frolic or land robbery or both, “about
three leagues to the northward of Cochin” Weoley states that “I got
clear of the pirates.” Thus ended the worst seven months in the life of
that worthy mariner.
What became of Bowen after Weoley escaped from him we do not know, at
least so far as the authentic record we are consulting is concerned.
Probably he met the violent end of his ilk; one thing is sure, however;
he was never hanged for the piracy of the _Speedy Return_, but--and
this makes the dread, dark sequel of the crime--another man who knew
not Bowen, Robert Drummond or the ill-fated ship _Speedy Return_
suffered by one of the most notable miscarriages of justice known to
the law as the murderer of Captain Drummond and the pirate of the
_Speedy Return_.
II
On March 8, 1702, a ship called the _Worcester_ weighed anchor in the
Downs and so began the long voyage from England to India. Perhaps
on that very day, certainly within a very few days of that date,
the brigantine _Content_ was burning to the edge of the waters of a
Madagascar bay, and her consort from Scotland, the _Speedy Return_ was
romping toward the Comoro Islands beneath the stern and unlawful drive
of a sea brigand.
The purpose of the _Worcester_ in the East Indies was to trade, though
she did not belong to the East India Company but appears to have been
owned by a small group of investors, probably retired sea captains for
the most part. To get a swift idea of what was meant by the East-India
trade you have only to recall the Hudson’s Bay Company in Canada, for
the methods of both these great trading corporations were practically
the same. Just as the Canadian company stalked across Canada from
fort to fort, so the India company ringed the coast of India with
forts, which, like the Canadians, they called “factories” and put in
charge of an officer termed a factor. Both companies held exclusive
monopolies in their respective regions by virtue of government grants;
both maintained fleets for the exportation of native products and the
importation of English wares and supplies. Each had to meet a certain
amount of competition in spite of its exclusive privileges.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account