Plain Sermons, preached at Archbishop Tenison's Chapel, Regent Street. Second SeriesCowan, James Galloway
Religion
Plain Sermons, preached at Archbishop Tenison's Chapel, Regent Street. Second Series
Cowan, James Galloway
Church of England -- Sermons -- 19th century; Sermons, English
faithfully delivered, had encountered. The people would not hear it.
They said it was obscure: a parable, an enigma, a poetical exaggeration.
GOD did not speak to them by it; or, if He did, they could not tell what
He said. “Ah! LORD GOD—alas! it is the old tale—I told them Thy words,
but they would not hear; they turned away from me, saying, Surely we
cannot understand him.”
Whichever was the case, whether Ezekiel only expected, or actually
experienced this treatment, we are sure that it was not wholly on account
of special obscurities which veiled the matters he had to declare, nor on
account of any special deafness and hardness of heart which belonged to
that people. For every Christian teacher has had reason to anticipate,
has actually endured the like from Christian congregations.
Often and often in preparing for the pulpit, is the preacher tempted to
set aside some important theme, to withhold some wonderful truth, to
forbear even to suggest some glorious consolation, because he believes
that in uttering it, he will not have the ears, or, if he has the ears,
he will not have the minds of his hearers; that they will not understand
his saying; and so, of course, will not receive it. Often and often,
too, when having used the full liberty of a Christian prophet and
whatever ability GOD has given him, of simplifying to the utmost, and
recommending with all his energy, the Gospel message, he is constrained
to feel, he is made, perhaps, by men’s open speech to know, that he is
regarded as the setter-forth of unmeaning, extravagant, or inapplicable
words. Of course, this charge is not always unfounded. We are not
inspired: we often speak our own words; our minds may not have rightly
conceived the subject we would discuss, or we may be wanting in ability
to express clearly what we understand. Under various influences we do,
too, at times speak more or less extravagantly, and our knowledge and
discretion are not so complete, that we invariably select what is
precisely suited to our hearers. In such cases, we ought to expect, we
have no right to complain of, the rejection, the disregard, or the
fruitlessness of our preaching. But, brethren, when we are sure that the
fault lies not in the preacher, when he has taken pains to enter into and
reveal the mind of the Spirit, to teach what he knows GOD would have you
understand and believe, to urge what he knows GOD would have you do, to
describe and recommend what he knows GOD would have you love and
seek—when he has done this, and you receive not his words, excusing
yourselves by saying that he is obscure, or over-strict, or fanciful, or
enthusiastic, or anything else—oh! then has he not a right to complain to
GOD? yea; and is it not his duty to remonstrate with you? Brethren, we
charge not such as you who are here assembled with the wilfulness of
Ezekiel’s hearers. In you we do not suppose there is any actual
unbelief, or deliberate dislike of the truth. It is not forced in your
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account