[Side-note: Recapitulation. The debate has shown that all gain is good, and that there is no evil gain--all men are lovers of gain--no man ought to be reproached for being so. The companion is compelled to admit this, though he declares that he is not persuaded.] _Sokr._--Let me remind you of what has passed. You contended that good men did not wish to acquire all sorts of gain, but only such as were good, and not such as were evil. But now, the debate has compelled us to acknowledge that all gains are good, whether small or great. _Comp._--As for me, Sokrates, the debate has compelled me rather than persuaded me.[14] _Sokr._--Presently, perhaps, it may even persuade you. But now, whether you have been persuaded or not, you at least concur with me in affirming that all gains, whether small or great, are good. That all good men wish for all good things. _Comp._--I do concur. _Sokr._--But you yourself stated that evil men love all gains, small and great? _Comp._--I said so. _Sokr._--According to your doctrine then, all men are lovers of gain, the good men as well as the evil? _Comp._--Apparently so. _Sokr._--It is therefore wrong to reproach any man as a lover of gain: for the person who reproaches is himself a lover of gain, just as much. [Footnote 14: Plat. Hipparch. 232 A-B. _Sokr._ [Greek: Ou)kou=n nu=n pa/nta ta\ ke/rdê o( lo/gos ê(ma=s ê)na/gkake kai\ smikra\ kai\ mega/la o(mologei=n a)gatha\ ei)=nai?] _Comp._ [Greek: Ê)na/gkake ga/r, ô)= Sô/krates, ma=llon e)me/ ge ê)\ pe/peiken.] _Sokr._ [Greek: A)ll' i)/sôs meta\ tou=to kai\ pei/seien a)\n.]] [Side-note: Minos. Question put by Sokrates to the companion. What is Law, or The Law? All law is the same, _quatenus_ law: what is the common constituent attribute?] The Minos, like the Hipparchus, is a dialogue carried on between Sokrates and a companion not named. It relates to Law, or The Law-- _Sokr._--What is Law (asks Sokrates)? _Comp._--Respecting what sort of Law do you enquire (replies the Companion)? _Sokr._--What! is there any difference between one law and another law, as to that identical circumstance, of being Law? Gold does not differ from gold, so far as the being gold is concerned--nor stone from stone, so far as being stone is concerned. In like manner, one law does not differ from another, all are the same, in so far as each is Law alike:--not, one of them more, and another less. It is about this as a whole that I ask you--What is Law? [Side-note: Answer--Law is, 1. The consecrated and binding customs. 2. The decree of the city. 3. Social or civic opinion.]