Great Britain -- History; Theater -- Great Britain -- History; Theater -- Moral and ethical aspects; Theater -- Religious aspects
Puritans should have classed players and Jesuits in the same category,
and deduced the parentage of both alike from the father of lies.
But as for these Puritans having been merely the sour, narrow, inhuman
persons they are vulgarly supposed to have been, _credat Judæus_. There
were sour and narrow men among them; so there were in the opposite party.
No Puritan could have had less poetry in him, less taste, less feeling,
than Laud himself. But is there no poetry save words? No drama save
that which is presented on the stage? Is this glorious earth, and the
souls of living men, mere prose, as long as ‘_carent vate sacro_,’ who
will, forsooth, do them the honour to make poetry out of a little of them
(and of how little!) by translating them into words, which he himself,
just in proportion as he is a good poet, will confess to be clumsy,
tawdry, ineffectual? Was there no poetry in these Puritans because they
wrote no poetry? We do not mean now the unwritten tragedy of the
battle-psalm and the charge; but simple idyllic poetry and quiet
home-drama, love-poetry of the heart and the hearth, and the beauties of
everyday human life. Take the most commonplace of them: was
Zeal-for-Truth Thoresby, of Thoresby Rise in Deeping Fen, because his
father had thought fit to give him an ugly and silly name, the less of a
noble lad? Did his name prevent his being six feet high? Were his
shoulders the less broad for it, his cheeks the less ruddy for it? He
wore his flaxen hair of the same length that every one now wears theirs,
instead of letting it hang half-way to his waist in essenced curls; but
was he therefore the less of a true Viking’s son, bold-hearted as his
sea-roving ancestors who won the Danelagh by Canute’s side, and settled
there on Thoresby Rise, to grow wheat and breed horses, generation
succeeding generation, in the old moated grange? He carried a Bible in
his jack-boot: but did that prevent him, as Oliver rode past him with an
approving smile on Naseby field, thinking himself a very handsome fellow,
with his moustache and imperial, and bright red coat, and cuirass well
polished, in spite of many a dint, as he sate his father’s great black
horse as gracefully and firmly as any long-locked and essenced cavalier
in front of him? Or did it prevent him thinking, too, for a moment, with
a throb of the heart, that sweet Cousin Patience far away at home, could
she but see him, might have the same opinion of him as he had of himself?
Was he the worse for the thought? He was certainly not the worse for
checking it the next instant, with manly shame for letting such ‘carnal
vanities’ rise in his heart while he was ‘doing the Lord’s work’ in the
teeth of death and hell: but was there no poetry in him then? No poetry
in him, five minutes later, as the long rapier swung round his head,
redder and redder at every sweep? We are befooled by names. Call him
Crusader instead of Roundhead, and he seems at once (granting him only
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account