Plotinos: Complete Works, v. 2: In Chronological Order, Grouped in Four PeriodsPlotinus
Philosophy
Plotinos: Complete Works, v. 2: In Chronological Order, Grouped in Four Periods
Plotinus
Plotinus
[252] This is Philo's secondary divinity, p. 27, Guthrie's "Message of
Philo Judaeus."
[253] That is, of the Intelligence and of the intelligible entities.
[254] Who is the Unity; a Numenian conception, fr. 36.
[255] A term reminiscent of the famous Christian Nicene formulation.
[256] That is we will form a "pair." Numenius, 14, also taught the
Pythagorean "pair or doubleness."
[257] See vi. 6.16.
[258] Pun between essences, "einai," and one, or "henos."
[259] "Ousia."
[260] Notice the two words for "essence." Plato Cratylus, 424; Cary, 87.
[261] As Plato in his Cratylus suggests.
[262] Or, essence.
[263] Or, essence, to be.
[264] Being.
[265] The goddess Hestia in Greek, or Vesta in Latin; but "hestia" also
meant a "stand." P. 401, Cratylus, Cary, 40.
[266] See Numenius, 67, 42.
[267] See ii. 9.1; iii. 9.9.
[268] Such as Numenius, 42, and Plutarch, de Isis et Osiris, Fr. Tr.
381.
[269] From "a-polus."
[270] See i. 6.4; iii. 5.1.
[271] See v. 5.1.
[272] See i. 6, end.
[273] Pun between "on" and "hen."
[274] See Plato, Rep. vi., Cary, 13.
[275] Mentioned in Biography of Plotinos, 16.
[276] See vi. 9. Another proof of the chronological arrangement.
[277] See v. 6.
[278] See v. 1, 2, 3, 6; vi. 7, 9.
[279] Of Bythos.
[280] Ennoia and Thelesis.
[281] By distinguishing within each of them potentiality and
actualization, Numenius, 25, multiplied them.
[282] Nous, and Logos or Achamoth; see ii. 9.6.
[283] The prophoric logos, see i. 2.3; and Philo. de Mosis Vita 3.
[284] See v. 3.4.
[285] See i. 1.7.
[286] This is a mingling of Platonic and Aristotelic thought, see
Ravaisson, Essay on the Metaphysics of Aristotle, ii. 407.
[287] Which would be nonsense; the Gnostics (Valentinus) had gone as
far as 33 aeons.
[288] See ii. 9.11.
[289] Between the sense-world, and the intelligible world, see iv.
3.5-8; v. 2.3. Plotinos is followed by Jamblichus and Damascius, but
Proclus and Hermias denied that the soul did not entirely enter into
the body, Stobaeus, Ecl. i. 52.
[290] See iv. 3.18; iv. 4.3.
[291] The intelligible world.
[292] See iv. 3.1-8; iv. 9.
[293] Thus Plotinos opposes the Gnostic belief that the world was
created, and will perish.
[294] See ii. 9, 9, 16.
[295] The Gnostic Horos.
[296] As Plato said Phaedrus, 246; Cary, 55.
[297] The Gnostic theory of creation by the fall of Sophia and Achamoth.
[298] See ii. 9.11. Valentinus however said only that Achamoth had
created all things in honor of the aeons; only the later theologians
held this view mentioned by Plotinos.
[299] See i. 2.1, 2.
[300] See I. Tim. vi. 20, 21; and ii. 9.9.
[301] See ii. 3.9.
[302] See ii. 1.4.
[303] This, however, is a mistake of Plotinos's, as the Gnostics held
not this, but that the pneumatic or spiritual humans dwell on earth,
and the psychic in heaven, as Bouillet remarks.
[304] So that they should remain in the model instead of descending
here below?
[305] By remaining in the model, instead of descending here below.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account