[435] In this book Plotinos studies time and eternity comparatively; first considering Plato's views in the Timaeus, and then the views of Pythagoras (1), Epicurus (9), the Stoics (7), and Aristotle (4, 8, 12). [436] The bracketed numbers are those of the Teubner edition; the unbracketed, those of the Didot edition. [437] See ii. 9.6. [438] As thought Plato, in his Timaeus, p. 37, Cary, 14. [439] Stobaeus. Ecl. Phys. i. 248. [440] A category, see vi. 2.7. [441] See vi. 2.7. [442] Or, with Mueller, "therefore, in a permanent future." [443] De Caelo, i. 9. [444] That is, with this divinity that intelligible existence is. [445] Arist. Met. iii. 2. [446] In the Timaeus, p. 29, Cary 10. [447] Stob. Ecl. Physic. ix. 40. [448] Porphyry, Principles, 32, end. [449] Especially Archytas, Simplicius, Comm. in Phys. Aristot. 165; Stob. Ecl. Physic. Heeren, 248-250. [450] Stobaeus, 254. [451] See Stobaeus, 250. [452] Aristotle, Physica, iv. 12. [453] Mueller: "Whether this may be predicated of the totality of the movement." [454] See vi. 6.4-10. [455] As Aristotle, Phys. iv. 11, claimed. [456] In Physica, iii. 7. [457] Stobaeus, Ecl. Phys. ix. 40. [458] When collectively considered as "A-pollo," following Numenius, 42, 67, Plotinos, v. 5.6. [459] See ii. 9.3. [460] See iii. 7.1, Introd. [461] See iii. 6.16, 17. [462] Porphyry, Principles, 32. [463] In the Timaeus, p. 38, Cary, 14. [464] In his Timaeus, p. 39, Cary, 14, 15. [465] As by Antiphanes and Critolaus, Stobaeus, Eclog. Phys. ix. 40, p. 252, Heeren. [466] See iii. 7.2. [467] As thought Aristotle, de Mem. et Remin. ii. 12. [468] See iv. 9. Transcriber's Notes: Punctuation and spelling were made consistent when a predominant preference was found in this four-volume set; otherwise they were not changed. Simple typographical errors were corrected. Inconsistent capitalization has not been changed. Ambiguous hyphens at the ends of lines were retained. Infrequent spelling of "Plotinus" changed to the predominant "Plotinos." Several opening or closing parentheses and quotation marks are unmatched; Transcriber has not attempted to determine where they belong. Page 678: A line containing "How then could one," appears to have been partly duplicated in the original. The duplicate text, which has been removed here, was: "Essence sence possess self-existence. How then could". Page 690, footnote 53 (originally 1): "he might have had noth-" does not complete on the next line and has been changed here to "he might have had nothing". Page 700: The two opening parentheses in '(from its "whatness" (or, essence[72]).' share the one closing parenthesis; unchanged. Page 744: unmatched closing quotation mark removed after "a being is suited by its like". Page 804: Closing parenthesis added after "single (unitary". Page 823: "resistance corporeal nature[15])." has no matching opening parenthesis; unchanged here.