Plotinos: Complete Works, v. 4: In Chronological Order, Grouped in Four PeriodsPlotinus
Philosophy
Plotinos: Complete Works, v. 4: In Chronological Order, Grouped in Four Periods
Plotinus
Plotinus
[18] See the Theataetus, p. 176. Carv. 84; the Phaedo. p. 69, Cary, 37;
the Republic, vi. p. 509; Cary, 19; x. p. 613, Cary, 12; the Laws, iv.
p. 716, Cary, 8; also Plotinos i. 2.1.
[19] See i. 9.
[20] A Stoic confutation of Epicurus and the Gnostics. As soon as
Porphyry has left him, Plotinos harks back to Amelius, on whose
leaving he had written against the Gnostics. He also returns to
Numenian thoughts. Bouillet notices that here Plotinos founded himself
on Chrysippus, Marcus Aurelius, and Epictetus, and was followed
by Nemesius. This new foundation enabled him to assume a rather
independent attitude. Against Plato, he taught that matter derived
existence from God, and that the union of the soul and body is not
necessarily evil. Against Aristotle, he taught that God is not only
the final, but also the efficient cause of the universe. Against
the Stoics, he taught that the human soul is free, and is a cause,
independent of the World Soul from which she proceeded. Against the
Gnostics, he insisted that the creator is good, the world is the best
possible, and Providence extends to mundane affairs. Against the
Manicheans, he taught that the evil is not positive, but negative, and
is no efficient cause, so that there is no dualism.
[21] Diog. Laert. x. 133.
[22] See iv. 2.4; vi. 7; see Plato, Philebus, p. 30, Cary, 56; Philo,
Leg. Alleg, vi. 7.
[23] Lactantius, de Ira Dei, 13.
[24] Ireneus, Ref. Her. ii. 3.
[25] As in vi. 7.1.
[26] Philo, de Creatione Mundi, 6.
[27] As the Gnostics taught; see ii. 9.1.
[28] As was held by the Gnostics, who within the divinity distinguished
potentiality and actuality, as we see in ii. 9.1.
[29] See ii. 9.3. 8.
[30] Numenius, 32.
[31] Plato, Timaeus, p. 48, Cary, 21. Statesman, p. 273, Cary, 16;
Laws, x. p. 904, Cary, 12.
[32] See ii. 9.2.
[33] From Aristotle, de Anima, 2.
[34] This is the Aristotelian psychological scheme.
[35] Clem. Al.; Strom. v. p. 712; Stobaeus, Ecl. Phys. i. p. 372, 446.
[36] iv. 8.12; Plato, Tim. p. 41. 69; Cary, 16, 44.
[37] Stob. Ecl. Eth. ii. 7.
[38] iii. 2.13.
[39] p. 253; Cary, 74.
[40] Sen. 526.
[41] According to Plato's Theaetetus, p. 176, Cary, 83; Numenius,16.
[42] Seneca, de Provid. 2.
[43] In his Republic, ix. p. 585, Cary, 10.
[44] See iii. 1.9.
[45] See iv. 3.12.
[46] See iv. 3.5.
[47] Gregory of Nyssa, Catech. Orat. 7.
[48] As thought Sallust, Consp. Cat. 52.
[49] Republic x. p. 620; Cary, 16; Numenius, 57.
[50] As said Sallust, Conspiration of Catiline, 52.
[51] As thought Epictetus, Manual, 31.
[52] In his Republic, vi. p. 488; Cary, 4.
[53] Marcus Aurelius. Thoughts, xi. 18.
[54] As thought Cicero, de Nat. Deor. iii. 63. 64.
[55] As thought Philo, de Prov. in Eus. Prep. Ev. viii. 14.
[56] According to Plato, in the Sophist and Protagoras, and the Stoics,
as in Marcus Aurelius. Meditations, vii. 63.
[57] As did the writer of Revelation, iv. 6.
[58] In his Timaeus, p. 29e, Cary, 10.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account