Plutarch's essays and miscellanies, Vol. 2 (of 5) : $b Comprising all his works collected under the title of "Morals"Plutarch
Philosophy
Plutarch's essays and miscellanies, Vol. 2 (of 5) : $b Comprising all his works collected under the title of "Morals"
Plutarch
Classical literature; Essays; Ethics; Philosophy
12. This kind of excuses may be framed as convenient remedies or
preventions when we have to do with persons of a difficult or
envious humor. But it is not amiss to use some little revocations
or corrections of what may seem spoken to our praise, before those
who are of a sedate and composed temper. If any commend us as those
who have learning, riches, or authority, we should hinder them from
choosing such topics, and rather desire of them, if they can, to
take notice of us as innocent, good, and useful. Thus we do not so
much confer as transfer praises, and seem not to be puffed up with
our applauders, but rather to be offended that they have not praised
conveniently and for truly meritorious things. We hide also inferior
with better qualifications; yet not as desiring to be commended, but
as teaching to commend aright. Such forms as these may be referred
hither: It is true, I have not walled the city with stones or brick;
but if you will view my fortifications, you shall find armor, and
horses, and confederates.[177] But more apt is that of Pericles. When
his friends bewailed him in the extremities of death, they put him
in mind of his authority and the great offices he had discharged, as
also what victories, trophies, and cities he had left the Athenians;
but he, raising himself a little, reproved them as fixing only upon
common encomiums, and enlarging rather on those of fortune than on
those of virtue, whereas they neglected the greatest matter, which was
more peculiar to himself,—that he had never been the occasion of any
Athenian’s wearing black. And hence the orator may learn, if he be a
good man, to transfer the eulogiums of his eloquence to his virtuous
life and manners; and the commander who is admired and applauded for
his conduct and happy fortune in the wars may freely propose his
clemency or justice as more worthy to be praised. Nay, further, it
becomes even an emperor, upon a profusion of such glutting praises as
flatterers are commonly guilty of, to say something of this nature:
No God am I. Why do ye equal me
Thus to th’ immortal powers.[178]
If you know me well, let my justice or temperance, my equanimity or
humanity, be rather spoken of. For even envy herself can easily concede
the lesser honors to him who refuses the greater; nor will it rob
any of true encomiums, not to expect false and vain ones. Therefore
several princes, who permitted not themselves to be called Gods or
the offspring of the Gods, have yet assumed the titles Philadelphus,
Philometor, Evergetes, or Theophilus; and were never offended when they
were honored with those glorious yet human appellations.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account