Plutarch's essays and miscellanies, Vol. 3 (of 5) : $b Comprising all his works collected under the title of "Morals"Plutarch
Philosophy
Plutarch's essays and miscellanies, Vol. 3 (of 5) : $b Comprising all his works collected under the title of "Morals"
Plutarch
Classical literature; Essays; Ethics; Philosophy
CHAPTER X.
HOW MANY SENSES ARE THERE?
The Stoics say that there are five senses properly so called, seeing,
hearing, smelling, tasting, and touching. Aristotle indeed doth not
add a sixth sense; but he assigns a common sense, which is the judge
of all compounded species; into this each sense casts its proper
representation, in which is discovered a transition of one thing into
another, like as we see in figure and motion where there is a change of
one into another. Democritus, that there are several species of senses,
which appertain to beings destitute of reason, to the Gods, and to wise
men.
CHAPTER XI.
HOW THE ACTIONS OF THE SENSES, THE CONCEPTIONS OF OUR MINDS, AND THE
HABIT OF OUR REASON ARE FORMED.
The Stoics affirm that every man, as soon as he is born, has the
principal and commanding part of his soul, which is in him like a sheet
of writing-paper, to which he commits all his notions. The first manner
of his inscribing is by denoting those notions which flow from the
senses. Suppose it be of a thing that is white; when the present sense
of it is vanished, there is yet retained the remembrance; when many
memorative notions of the same similitude do concur, then he is said to
have an experience; for experience is nothing else but the abundance of
notions that are of the same form met together. Some of these notions
are naturally begotten according to the aforesaid manner, without the
assistance of art; the others are produced by discipline, learning,
and industry; these only are properly called notions, the others are
prenotions. But reason, which gives us the denomination of rational,
is completed by prenotions in the first seven years. The conception
of the mind is the vision that the intelligence of a rational animal
hath received; when that vision falls upon the rational soul, then it
is called the conception of the mind, for it hath derived its name
from the mind (ἐννόημα from νοῦς). Therefore these visions are not
to be found in any other animals; they are appropriated only to Gods
and to us men. If these we consider generally, they are phantasms; if
specifically, they are notions. As pence or staters, if you consider
them according to their own value, are merely pence and staters; but if
you give them as a price for a naval voyage, they are called not merely
pence, &c., but your fraught.
CHAPTER XII.
WHAT IS THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN IMAGINATION (φαντασια[** φαντασία]),
IMAGINABLE (φανταστόν), FANCY (φανταστικόν), AND PHANTOM (φάντασμα)?
Chrysippus affirms, these four are different one from another.
Imagination (he says) is that passion raised in the soul which
discovers itself and that which was the efficient of it; for example,
after the eye hath looked upon a thing that is white, the sight of
which produceth in the mind a certain impression, this gives us
reason to conclude that the object of this impression is white, which
affecteth us. So is it with touching and smelling.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account