Plutarch's essays and miscellanies, Vol. 3 (of 5) : $b Comprising all his works collected under the title of "Morals"Plutarch
Philosophy
Plutarch's essays and miscellanies, Vol. 3 (of 5) : $b Comprising all his works collected under the title of "Morals"
Plutarch
Classical literature; Essays; Ethics; Philosophy
all others the lightest sort of meat. And it stands with reason, that
the sea should produce the most nourishing and wholesome food, seeing
it yields us the most refined, the purest, and therefore the most
agreeable air.
4. You say right, says Lamprias, but let us think of something else to
confirm what you have spoken. I remember my old grandfather was used
to say in derision of the Jews, that they abstained from most lawful
flesh; but we will say that that is most lawful meat which comes from
the sea. For we can claim no great right over land creatures, which
are nourished with the same food, draw the same air, wash in and drink
the same water, that we do ourselves; and when they are slaughtered,
they make us ashamed of what we are doing, with their hideous cries;
and then again, by living amongst us, they arrive at some degree of
familiarity and intimacy with us. But sea creatures are altogether
strangers to us, and are born and brought up as it were in another
world; neither does their voice, look, or any service they have done us
plead for their life. For this kind of creatures are of no use at all
to us, nor is there any necessity that we should love them. But that
place which we inhabit is hell to them, and as soon as ever they enter
upon it they die.
_QUESTION V._
WHETHER THE JEWS ABSTAINED FROM SWINE’S FLESH BECAUSE THEY
WORSHIPPED THAT CREATURE, OR BECAUSE THEY HAD AN ANTIPATHY AGAINST
IT.
CALLISTRATUS, POLYCRATES, LAMPRIAS.
1. After these things were spoken, and some in the company were minded
to say something in defence of the contrary opinion, Callistratus
interrupted their discourse and said: Sirs, what do you think of that
which was spoken against the Jews, that they abstain from the most
lawful flesh? Very well said, quoth Polycrates, for that is a thing
I very much question, whether it was that the Jews abstained from
swine’s flesh because they conferred divine honor upon that creature,
or because they had a natural aversion to it. For whatever we find in
their own writings seems to be altogether fabulous, except they have
some more solid reasons which they have no mind to discover.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account