Plutarch's essays and miscellanies, Vol. 5 (of 5) : $b Comprising all his works collected under the title of "Morals"Plutarch
Philosophy
Plutarch's essays and miscellanies, Vol. 5 (of 5) : $b Comprising all his works collected under the title of "Morals"
Plutarch
Classical literature; Essays; Ethics; Philosophy
Our friend therefore indeed, having in a lecture of his demonstrated
this proposition of Anaxagoras, that the sun communicates to the moon
what brightness she has, was well esteemed for it. As for me, I will
not say what I have learned of you or with you, but having taken it
for granted, will pass on to the rest. It is then probable that the
moon is illuminated, not like a glass or crystal, by the brightness
of the sun’s rays shining through her, nor yet again, by a certain
collustration and conjunction of light and brightness, as when many
torches set together augment the light of one another. For so she
would be no less full in her conjunction or first quarter than in her
opposition, if she did not obstruct or repel the rays of the sun, but
let them pass through her by reason of her rarity, or if he did by a
contemperature shine upon her and kindle the light within her. For we
cannot allege her declinations and aversions in the conjunction or new
moon, as when it is half-moon or when she appears crescent or in the
wane; but being then perpendicularly (as Democritus says) under him
that illuminates her, she receives and admits the sun; so that then it
is probable she should appear, and he shine through her. But this she
is so far from doing, that she is not only then unseen, but also often
hides the sun, as Empedocles has it:
The sun’s bright beams from us she turns aside,
And of the earth itself as much doth hide,
As her orb’s breadth can cover;
as if the light of the sun fell not upon another star, but upon night
and darkness. And as for what Posidonius says, that the depth of the
moon’s body is the cause why the light of the sun cannot pierce through
her to us, this is evidently refuted; for the air, which is infinite
and of a far greater depth than the body of the moon, is nevertheless
all over illustrated and enlightened by the rays of the sun.
It remains then that, according to the opinion of Empedocles, the
light of the moon which appears to us comes from the repercussion
and reflection of the sun’s beams. And for this reason it comes not
to us hot and bright, as in all probability it would, if her shining
proceeded either from inflammation or the commixtion of two lights. But
as voices reverberated cause an echo more obscure and less express than
the speech that was pronounced, and as the blows of darts and arrows,
rebounding from some wall against which they are shot, are more mild
and gentle;
So Titan’s lustre, smiting the moon’s orb,
yields but a faint and feeble reflection and repercussion of brightness
upon us, its force being abated and weakened by the refraction.
17. Sylla then, taking up the discourse, said: There is indeed a
great deal of probability in all that you have spoken. But as to the
strongest objection that is brought against it, has it, think you, been
any way weakened by this discourse? Or has our friend quite passed it
over in silence?
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account