Plutarch's essays and miscellanies, Vol. 5 (of 5) : $b Comprising all his works collected under the title of "Morals"Plutarch
Philosophy
Plutarch's essays and miscellanies, Vol. 5 (of 5) : $b Comprising all his works collected under the title of "Morals"
Plutarch
Classical literature; Essays; Ethics; Philosophy
They then who affirm that there are certain irregular triangular
figures in our body, and tell us also that shuddering, trembling, and
quivering, and whatever else we suffer of the same nature, proceed
from the roughness of those figures, if they mistake in the parts,
nevertheless derive the beginning from whence they ought. For we ought
to begin the question—as it were from Vesta—from the substance of all
things. By which it chiefly appears wherein a philosopher differs from
a physician, a husbandman, or a piper. For it is sufficient for these
to contemplate the last causes. For if the consideration of the nearest
causes of the affection go no farther than to find that the cause of a
fever is intenseness of heat, or the lighting of some humor where it
ought not to be, that the cause of blasting is the scorching heat of
the sun after rain, and that the cause why pipes give a bass sound is
the inclination of the pipes or the bringing them near one to another;
this is enough for the artist to know in reference to his business. But
when a philosopher for contemplation’s sake scrutinizes into the truth,
the knowledge of remote causes is not the end but the beginning of his
proceeding in search of the first and ultimate causes. Wherefore Plato
and Democritus, enquiring after the cause of heat and gravity, did
not stop at the consideration of earth and fire, but bringing things
perceptible to sense to beginnings intelligible only by the mind, they
went on even to the smallest, as it were the seeds of what they sought
for.
9. But it is much the better way for us in the first place to move
forward upon those things which are perceptible to sense, wherein
Empedocles, Strato, and the Stoics placed the substances of active
qualities; the Stoics ascribing primitive cold to the air, Empedocles
and Strato to the water; and perhaps there might be somebody else who
might affirm the earth to be the substance of cold. But first let us
consider the opinions of those already named.
Seeing then that fire is both hot and bright, therefore there must
be something opposite to fire which is cold and dark. For as dark is
opposite to light, so is cold to hot. Besides, as dark confounds the
sight, so cold confounds the feeling. But heat diffuses the sense of
feeling, as light diffuses the sense of seeing. Therefore that which is
first dark in nature is first cold. Now that the air is first dark, was
not unknown to the poets; for that they call the air darkness:
The thickened air the fleet with darkness covered,
Nor could the moonlight be from heaven discovered.[119]
And again:
Then darkness scattered and the fog dispelled,
The sun brake forth, and all the fight beheld.[120]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account