Greece -- Biography -- Early works to 1800; Rome -- Biography -- Early works to 1800
III. Both were arrogant when in prosperity, and set no bounds to their
luxury and pleasures. Yet it cannot be said that Demetrius was ever so
immersed in enjoyments as to let slip the time for action, but he only
dedicated the superfluity of his leisure to enjoyment, and used his
Lamia, like the mythical nightmare, only when he was half asleep or at
play. When he was preparing for war, no ivy wreathed his spear, no
perfume scented his helmet, nor did he go forth from his bed-chamber to
battle covered with finery, but, as Euripides says, he laid the Bacchic
wand aside, and served the unhallowed god of war, and, indeed, never
suffered any reverse through his own carelessness or love of pleasure.
But just as in pictures we often see Omphale stealing the club and
stripping off the lion's skin from Herakles, so Cleopatra frequently
would disarm Antonius and turn his mind to pleasure, persuading him to
give up mighty enterprises and even necessary campaigns to wander and
sport with her on the shores of Canopus and beside the tomb of Osiris.
At last, like Paris, he fled from battle to nestle on her breast, though
Paris only took refuge in his chamber after he had been defeated in
battle, while Antonius, by his pursuit of Cleopatra, gave up his chance
of victory.
IV. Moreover, in marrying several wives, Demetrius did not break through
any custom, for he only did what had been usual for the kings of
Macedonia since the days of Philip and Alexander, and what was done by
Lysimachus and Ptolemy in his own time; and he showed due respect to all
his wives; while Antonius, in the first place, married two wives at the
same time, which no Roman had ever dared to do before, and then drove
away his own countrywoman and his legitimate wife to please a foreigner,
and one to whom he was not legally married. Yet with all his excesses
Antonius was never led by his vices into such sacrilegious impiety as is
recorded of Demetrius. We are told that no dogs are allowed to enter the
Acropolis,[481] because these animals copulate more openly than any
others; but Demetrius consorted with harlots in the very temple of the
virgin goddess, and debauched many of the Athenian citizens, while,
although one would have imagined that a man of such a temperament would
be especially averse to cruelty, Demetrius must be charged with this in
allowing, or rather compelling, the most beautiful and modest of the
Athenians to suffer death in order to avoid outrage. To sum up, the
vices of Antonius were ruinous to himself, while those of Demetrius were
ruinous to others.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account