Greece -- Biography -- Early works to 1800; Rome -- Biography -- Early works to 1800
I. Now that we have completed the narrative of these men's lives, it
remains for us to compare them with one another. As for the Gracchi, not
even their bitterest enemies could deny that they were the most virtuous
of all the Romans, or that they were excellently well nurtured and
educated; while Agis and Kleomenes appear to have excelled them in
strength of mind, because they both, after having been brought up in the
same fashion by which their elders had been corrupted, became the
restorers of temperance and simplicity of life. Furthermore, the
Gracchi, who lived at a period when Rome was at the height of its
greatness and renown, felt ashamed to fall short of the glorious
achievements of their forefathers; while the virtuous impulses of the
others were not checked by their fathers having pursued the opposite
course of policy, or by the miserable and distracted condition of their
country. The greatest proof of the unselfishness and indifference to
money of the Gracchi is that they filled various offices in the state,
and yet kept their hands clean from dishonest gains; while it would be
an insult to Agis to praise him for not having taken other men's money,
as he gave up to his countrymen his own private property, which alone
was worth six hundred talents. If then he thought it discreditable for
him to be richer than any of his countrymen, even though his riches were
lawfully acquired, what must have been his abhorrence of those who
obtain money wrongfully.
II. There was also a great difference in the boldness and extent of
their schemes of reform. The Gracchi were chiefly engaged in the
construction of roads and the founding of cities, and Tiberius's most
important measure of reform was the division of the public lands among
the people, while the best act of his brother Caius was the
establishment of a mixed tribunal by adding to the three hundred
Senators three hundred Roman Knights. The revolution effected by Agis
and Kleomenes was of quite a different kind. They thought, in Plato's
words, that to proceed by slow degrees was merely cutting off the heads
of the hydra,[124] and therefore they by one comprehensive measure swept
away all abuses at once: although it would be nearer the truth to say
that they swept all abuses out of the state by restoring to it its
original constitution. It may also be observed that the reforms of the
Gracchi were opposed by some of the most powerful men in Rome, whereas
the legislation which was begun by Agis, and completed by Kleomenes,
followed a famous and ancient precedent, the rhetras on sobriety and
equality which had been communicated to their ancestors by Lykurgus with
the sanction of the Pythian Apollo. It is also most important to notice
that the reforms of the Gracchi made Rome no greater than she was
before, while the acts of Kleomenes enabled him in a short time to make
Sparta mistress of the whole of Peloponnesus, and to engage in a contest
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account