Poetic diction: A study of eighteenth century verseQuayle, Thomas
History
Poetic diction: A study of eighteenth century verse
Quayle, Thomas
English language -- Diction; English poetry -- 18th century -- History and criticism
[15] That is to say, as Mr. John Drinkwater has recently put it, it
was “the common language, but raised above the common pitch, of the
coffee-houses and boudoirs.”—“Victorian Poetry,” 1923, pp. 30-32.
[16] _Vide_ Elton, “The Augustan Ages,” 1889, pp. 419 foll.
[17] Cp. “Essay on Criticism,” I, ll. 130-140.
[18] John Dennis, of course, at the beginning of the century, is to
be found pleading that “passion is the chief thing in poetry,” (“The
Advancement and Reformation of Modern Poetry,” 1701); but it is to be
feared that he is only, so to speak, ringing the changes on the Rules.
[19] “A Parallel of Poetry and Painting,” ed. Ker, _op. cit._, Vol. II,
p. 147.
[20] “A Parallel of Poetry and Painting,” Ker, _op cit._, Vol. II, p.
148. “_Operum Colores_ is the very word which Horace uses to signify
words and elegant expressions.” etc.
[21] Lessing’s “Laokoon,” which appeared in 1766, may in this, as in
other connexions, be regarded as the first great Romantic manifesto.
The limitations of poetry and the plastic arts were analysed, and the
fundamental conditions to which each art must adhere, if it is to
accomplish its utmost, were definitely and clearly laid down.
[22] “Polymetis” (1747), p. 311.
[23] “Biographia Literaria,” Chap. XXII.
[24] _Ibid._, Chap. IV.
[25] _Vide_ especially Babbitt, “The New Laocoon, An Essay on the
Confusion of the Arts” (1910), to which these paragraphs are indebted;
and for a valuable survey of the relations of English poetry with
painting and with music, see “English Poetry in Its Relation to Painting
and the other Arts,” by Laurence Binyon (London, 1919), especially pp.
15-19.
[26] _Vide_ “Elizabethan Critical Essays,” ed. Gregory Smith, Vol. I,
Intro. (Oxford, 1904).
[27] _Vide_, e.g., Addison, “Spectator” papers on “Paradise Lost” (No.
285, January 26, 1712).
[28] Essay, “Poetry Distinguished from other Writing” (Miscellaneous
Works, 1820, Vol. IV, pp. 408-14).
[29] _Ibid._, p. 22.
[30] “Lives,” Hill, _op. cit._, Vol. I, p. 420.
[31] “Lives”: Cowley; cp. “The Rambler,” No. 158.
[32] Cp. Boswell’s “Life” (1851 edition), Vol. I, p. 277: “He enlarged
very convincingly upon the excellence of rhyme over blank verse in
English poetry”; also _ibid._, Vol. II, p. 84.
[33] “Lives,” ed. Hill, _op. cit._, Vol. III, pp. 416 foll.
[34] _Ibid._, p. 341.
[35] This is of course exemplified in his own poetic practice, and it
has been held sufficient to explain the oft-debated scantiness of his
literary production. But for remarkable examples of his minuteness and
scrupulosity in the matter of poetic diction see the letter to West
referred to above; to Mason, January 13, 1758 (Tovey, _op. cit._, II, p.
12), and to Beattie, March 8, 1771 (_ibid._, II, p. 305).
[36] Cp. Courthope, “History of English Poetry,” Vol. V, pp. 218 foll.
[37] _Vide_ “Elizabethan Critical Essays,” _op. cit._, Intro., pp. LV-LX.
[38] Preface to the “Fables,” Ker, _op. cit._, Vol. II, pp. 266-67.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account