Poetry of the Anti-Jacobin: Comprising the Celebrated Political and Satirical Poems, of the Rt. Hons. G. Canning, John Hookham Frere, W. Pitt, the Marquis Wellesley, G. Ellis, W. Gifford, the Earl of Carlisle, and Others.
History
Poetry of the Anti-Jacobin: Comprising the Celebrated Political and Satirical Poems, of the Rt. Hons. G. Canning, John Hookham Frere, W. Pitt, the Marquis Wellesley, G. Ellis, W. Gifford, the Earl of Carlisle, and Others.
English poetry; France -- History -- Revolution, 1789-1799 -- Poetry; Great Britain -- Politics and government -- 1789-1820
A Portrait of “Arthur O’Connor, late Member in the Irish Parliament
for Borough of Philipstown, painted by J. Dowling, engraved by W.
Ward,” was published in London, 18th April, 1798. Another Portrait
in military uniform is to be found in Barrington’s _Memoirs of the
Union_. He figures also in several of GILLRAY’S _Caricatures_.
In the _Birmingham Daily Post_ of April 2, 1888, it is stated that
THE HON. R. E. O’CONNOR, M.A., barrister-at-law, the latest addition
to the Legislative Council of New South Wales, is a grandson of
ARTHUR O’CONNOR, one of the leaders of the United Irishmen, who died
a General in the service of France.
When O’CONNOR was acquitted by the Jury, on the above-named
occasion, but before the Judge had given orders for his release, a
strange scene occurred in court, an attempt being made, as it was
alleged, by SACKVILLE, EARL OF THANET, ROBERT FERGUSSON (in after
years known as CUTLAR FERGUSSON, Judge-Advocate-General), and others
to facilitate his escape in order to avoid further charges about to
be preferred against him, Binns also being implicated for this
exploit, which was unsuccessful, but attended with violence. These
confederates were tried at the Bar of the Court of King’s Bench,
25th April, 1799. The Counsel for the Crown were Sir John Scott
[Lord Eldon], Law [Lord Ellenborough], Sir W. Garrow, Sir C. Abbot,
&c., while the defendants had the powerful advocacy of Erskine and
others. His Lordship and Mr. Fergusson were found guilty after a
long and ingenious defence by the latter, which presaged his future
eminence as a Counsel. LORD THANET was ordered to pay a fine of
£1000; to be imprisoned in the Tower for a year; and to give
security for good behaviour for seven years on the expiration of the
sentence; himself in £10,000, and two sureties in £5000 each.
FERGUSSON was ordered to pay a fine of £100; to be imprisoned in the
King’s Bench prison for one year; to give security for good
behaviour for seven years from the expiration of the sentence;
himself in £500, and two sureties in £250 each.—See _State Trials_,
vols. 26 and 27.—ED.]
JAMES NAPPER TANDY.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account