Poine: a study in ancient Greek blood-vengeanceTreston, Hubert Joseph
History
Poine: a study in ancient Greek blood-vengeance
Treston, Hubert Joseph
Criminal law (Greek law); Greece -- Civilization; Greek drama (Tragedy) -- History and criticism; Homicide (Greek law); Vendetta
Ridgeway, who believes that the whole of the _Iliad_ and the _Odyssey_
was composed before 1000 B.C.[66] and who has done so much to
differentiate Achaean and Pelasgian burial customs, finds in the _Nekuia_
a fusion of _Achaean and Pelasgian ideas_. ‘Such a blending of religious
ideas,’ he says, ‘is but the natural concomitant of the intermixture of
two different races and cultures.’[67] But Ridgeway is still not quite
accurate if he means to imply that any real blending of _ideas_ had
occurred. We have said that the ideas underlying these different rites
could never be really fused, but they could amalgamate in the form of
an eclectic religion. We may regard it as a confirmation of our view
that Ridgeway has to confess that the fusion of Achaean and Pelasgian
ritual of which there is a solitary suggestion in the _Nekuia_ does not
seem to have established itself in Greece very long before the time of
Aeschylus.[68] He says: ‘According to the Homeric doctrine, once the body
was burned, the spirit returned no more from its dwelling place with
the dead. But on this point Aeschylus held a very different view. It
is evident that by the time of Aeschylus an eclectic doctrine had been
evolved. The Homeric belief in a separate abode for disembodied spirits
was adopted, but at the same time the ancient doctrine of the constant
presence of the soul in the grave of its body was retained, the gulf
between both doctrines being bridged over by the theory that even though
the body was burned, the soul could return to its ashes in the grave.’
Now the tomb-offerings made by Odysseus in the _Nekuia_ do not take place
at a tomb, but at the entrance to Hades. The inference from this fact is
_not_ that there was a blending of Achaean and Pelasgian _ideas_, in the
cult of the dead, but that it was possible for Achaeans who practised
other forms of Chthonian ritual to perform such rites when commanded to
do so in the realm of Hades, _the only place where their dogmas made
such rites intelligible_. If the Achaeans had believed in the Pelasgian
doctrine of the presence of the soul in the tomb, they would normally
have made Chthonian offerings at their tombs. Believing, as they did,
that the souls of the dead lived in Hades, they could only find meaning
in such a rite if they came, as Odysseus came, to the realm of Hades. We
have seen that the Achaeans, and Odysseus in particular, were familiar
with Pelasgian beliefs, and had, in common with their subjects, certain
Chthonian rites. The _Nekuia_ therefore, instead of proving a fusion of
beliefs, seems to us to suggest, on the contrary, that such a fusion had
not taken place in Homeric Greece.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account