Poine: a study in ancient Greek blood-vengeanceTreston, Hubert Joseph
History
Poine: a study in ancient Greek blood-vengeance
Treston, Hubert Joseph
Criminal law (Greek law); Greece -- Civilization; Greek drama (Tragedy) -- History and criticism; Homicide (Greek law); Vendetta
the Mediterranean, whether they were Achaeans, Celts, Goths, Norsemen or
Turks, must be in part accounted for by the mere fact that they formed in
each case the upper and ruling class, and could therefore afford to lead
a life of luxury which was the very bane of their race.’ For our part we
are convinced with Leaf[7] that ‘an invasion of Southern Greece by rude
tribes from the north or north-west swept away the Achaean civilisation
after the Homeric age’; that a military confederation of hereditary
monarchs and nobles, such as that of the Achaeans, could not have lost
its unified control if these inherent factors of disintegration had not
been supplemented by an invasion from without.
O. Müller[8] has pointed out that in Thessaly, the former realm of Peleus
and Achilles, there existed in historical times three strata of social
and political privilege: (1) the Thessalians, post-Homeric immigrants,
who ruled directly over the central territory, including the towns of
Larissa, Crannon, Pharsalus, Iolcus. (2) Perioeci or semi-independent
vassals, such as the Perrhaebians, the Magnesians, and the Phthiotian
Achaeans, who paid tribute and were bound to assist in war. (3) Penestae,
of Pelasgian stock, like the Helots of Sparta, who cultivated the land
and served in war, who had private rights but no political privileges,
who were, in a word, serfs, but not slaves. He mentions, further,[9]
that the Achaeans of the north coast of the Peloponnese remained in towns
and fortified strongholds, keeping entirely aloof from the natives; they
were still conquerors here, though they had become vassals elsewhere. In
Sparta there appears to have been a mingling of Achaeans and Dorians.
Thucydides says[10] that here ‘the few rule over the many, having
obtained sovereignty by victory in the field.’ That this victory was not
very decisive is suggested by the view, which is commonly held,[11] that
one of the two Royal families of Sparta was Achaean. The Perioeci of
Laconia were always considered Achaeans[12]; there were about a hundred
towns of Laconian Perioeci, both inland and on the coast; they paid
tribute to Sparta, but they had a monopoly of trade and commerce, and in
the time of Nabis were liberated and federated as independent states of
the Achaean league.[13] The Helots, of course, were serfs. They tilled
the soil, and lived in hamlets which made up the greater part of the town
of Sparta. They were probably Pelasgians, though they are called Achaeans
by Theopompus.[14] Similarly, in Argos and in Corinth there are traces
of pre-Dorian peoples who can probably be regarded as including some
remnants of the Homeric Achaeans.[15]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account