Poine: a study in ancient Greek blood-vengeanceTreston, Hubert Joseph
History
Poine: a study in ancient Greek blood-vengeance
Treston, Hubert Joseph
Criminal law (Greek law); Greece -- Civilization; Greek drama (Tragedy) -- History and criticism; Homicide (Greek law); Vendetta
In the case of kin-slaying in a ‘passion,’ the influence of the ghosts’
will was especially vigorous. Plato says[106] that even when the
‘involuntary’ slayer had served a term of three years’ exile, and had
returned to his native land, he could never return to his family and his
home, or share with his kindred in domestic rites. Thus the Erinnys of
the slain kinsman refused to be controlled by a centralised autocracy
at Delphi, or even by the will of native State-gods. Hence, perhaps,
it is that in the dramatised versions of the Oresteia, Athene has to
use ‘Persuasion’[107] to induce the Furies of Clytaemnestra to become
Eumenides. Hence the Furies say of Orestes[108]:
‘His mother’s blood upon the Earth he spilled.
Shall he in Argos dwell—his father’s home?
What phratry-altar can him e’er receive?
What common lustral water can he share?’
Hence, also, as Glotz points out,[109] the preliminary plea on oath of
the accuser and the accused, in homicide cases, was taken before the
altar of the Erinnyes or the Semnai Theai; and the defendant who was
acquitted of murder by the Areopagus, as well as the returned exile who
had paid the penalty of involuntary homicide, offered sacrifice there.
THE RITUAL OF HOMICIDE-PURGATION
In regard to the ceremonial of purgation by which the slayer, in certain
circumstances, was ‘cleansed’ or purified, we have already[110] pointed
out what we consider to have been the origin of the rite; and we have
shown how the analogies which existed between such a ceremonial and the
general Chthonian sacrifices of ‘expiation,’ ‘placation,’ and ‘aversion’
caused these rites to be confused with one another in the minds of
ancient and of modern writers. The ceremonial of homicide-purgation
appears at first sight so simple and elementary in character that we
would be inclined to assume _a priori_ that it could have been duly
performed by any ordinary person. But, in fact, we shall see, the
performance became the privilege of priests or theocratic nobles. An
animal, generally a pig,[111] but sometimes a calf or a lamb,[112] was
bled to death and the warm flowing blood was poured over the hands of
the slayer, passing away into the sea or into a running stream. The dead
animal was then thrown into the water, or was buried, but it could not be
eaten.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account