[8] Dareste-Hassouillier-Reinach, _I.J.G._ No. xxi. ll. 10-19 (vol. i. p. 3 ff.); see also Hicks and Hill, _Gk. Hist. Inscript._ p. 113; Philippi, _Areopag._, p. 335. [9] Philippi, _Areopag._, pp. 335-337, proposes to restore the end of l. 12 as follows: ἢ βουλεύσεως τὸν ἀεὶ βασιλεύσαντα. For ἐσέσθων (l. 18), Demosthenes gives αἰδεσάσθων, _c. Macart._ 1069. The unrestored inscription has εσεσθ... (l. 18). [10] Andocides, _de Myst._ 94; Dem. _contra Conon_. 1264, 20. [11] Gilbert, _G.C.A._ (Eng. trans.), p. 126; Hicks and Hill, _op. cit._ p. 114. [12] _Ath. Pol._ 57. [13] _C. Macart._ 1069. [13A] ἐσέσθων from ἔσίημι. [14] _Areop._ p. 238. [15] ix. ch. 9; _infra_, p. 210 ff. [16] _Tetralogies_, ii. 4, iii. 2, iii. 3. [17] _Eum._ p. 141. [18] _Areop._ p. 16. [19] _Ath. Pol._ 57; _infra_, p. 250. [20] Homer, _Il._ xviii. 500. [21] _Op. cit._ p. 190; _supra_, p. 92. [22] _Op. cit._ pp. 32-40, 173, 439. [23] See _infra_, pp. 201 ff.; 256. [24] See _infra_, p. 204. [25] _Infra_, p. 263 ff. [26] _Infra_, p. 268. [27] Philippi, _Areop._ pp. 138-9. [28] _Supra_, p. 85 f. [29] _Supra_, p. 143 ff. [30] _Op. cit._ pp. 311, 324. [31] _Infra_, p. 209 f. [32] _Supra_, p. 174 ff. [33] But see _infra_, p. 213. [34] P. 302; _supra_, p. 53. [35] _Op. cit._ p. 173. [36] See _supra_, pp. 82, 93. [37] Coulanges, _op. cit._ pp. 169-176, 252, 360, 367, 376. [38] _Ib._ p. 331. [39] _Supra_, p. 88. [40] _Supra_, p. 85. [41] _Eum._ p. 93. [42] _Op. cit._ p. 105. [43] _Op. cit._ pp. 180, 234, 537, 594. [44] _Areop._ p. 148. [45] _Laws_, ix. ch. 12. [46] See, _e.g._, Müller, _Eum._ p. 142, and _supra_, p. 197. [47] _Exodus_, xxi. 28-36. [48] _In Aristoc._ 645. _Cf._ Pausanias, i. 28, Aristotle, _Ath. Pol._ 57. [49] ἀνάκρισις. [50] _Laws_, ix. ch. 12. [51] _Supra_, p. 196. [52] _Infra_, p. 258 ff.; Arist. _Ath. Pol._ 52. [53] οἵ ἕνδεκα. [54] _Ath. Pol._ 57. [55] viii. 120, also viii. 90. [56] ἀφυλαξία. [57] Paus. i. 3. 14; Plato, _Euthyphro_, 2; Pollux, viii. 90. [58] μὴ ἐκ προνοίας. [59] Aristotle, _Ath. Pol._ 57, 3. [60] _Ib._ 57, 2. [61] See _supra_, pp. 88, 200 ff. [62] _C. Macart._ 1069; ἐντὸς ἀνεψιότητος is usually interpreted ‘nearer than cousins’: we read ἀνεψιούς instead of ἀνεψιοῦ; as the word recurs, we translate it, in the second instance, as ‘cousins-in-law’: we interpret ἀνεψιαδούς as sons of female cousins. [63] ἐὰν δὲ αἰδέσασθαι δέῃ, ἐὰν μὲν πατὴρ ᾗ ἢ ἀδελφὸς ἢ υἱεῖς, πάντας ἢ τὸν κωλύοντα κρατεῖν. ἐὰν δὲ τοὺτων μηδεὶς ᾖ, κτείνῃ δ’ ἄκων, γνῶσι δ’ οἱ πεντήκοντα καὶ εἷς ἢ οἱ ἐφέται, ἄκοντα κτεῖναι, αἰδεσάσθων οἱ πράτορες ἐὰν θέλωσι, δέκα. τούτους δ’ οἱ πεντήκοντα καὶ εἷς ἀριστίνδην αἱρείσθων. [64] _Supra_, p. 143 ff. [65] _Op. cit._ pp. 314-316, p. 324. [66] _Eum._ p. 93. [67] _Supra_, p. 174 ff. [68] _In Aristoc._ 634-5. [69] See Müller, _Eum._ p. 93. [70] _In Aristoc._ 643-4. [71] Glotz takes this word too literally, _op. cit._ p. 311 ff. [72] _Supra_, p. 178. [73] _Laws_, ix. ch. 9.