Poine: a study in ancient Greek blood-vengeanceTreston, Hubert Joseph
History
Poine: a study in ancient Greek blood-vengeance
Treston, Hubert Joseph
Criminal law (Greek law); Greece -- Civilization; Greek drama (Tragedy) -- History and criticism; Homicide (Greek law); Vendetta
In regard to the question of the Solonian origin of the Areopagus,
Gilbert, arguing from Aristotle’s account, holds[138] that the Council
of the Areopagus was in existence even before Dracon’s time. ‘The great
powers,’ he says, ‘which the Council of the Areopagus possessed in the
government before Dracon were considerably curtailed by him ... for
whereas the Areopagus before Dracon ... exercised judicial functions
... so long as Dracon’s constitution lasted, that council was merely
the guardian of the laws and superintended the magistrates. Dracon
transferred the judicial powers which the Areopagus previously possessed
to the Ephetae and the Prytaneis.’ This account exceeds, we think,
the limits of legitimate inference from the text of Aristotle.[139]
We cannot even be sure that the text of Aristotle is trustworthy. The
Athenians did not possess any accurate evidence in regard to their
early institutions. Müller[140] rejects the view (which is also held by
Schömann)[141] that Dracon interfered with the judicial functions of the
Areopagus. Pollux[142] states definitely that Solon added the Council of
the Areopagus to the already existing Ephetae courts. Gilbert regards
this statement as a confirmation of his theory that Dracon created the
jurisdiction of the Ephetae. We think it is rather a refutation of it.
Plutarch apparently did not believe that an Areopagus court, as distinct
from the Ephetae, existed before Solon’s time: for he thinks[143] that
a so-called law of Solon which referred to persons ‘condemned by the
Areopagus, by the Ephetae, or, in the Prytaneum by the Kings,’ should
have read ‘those condemned for such offences as (now) belong to the
Areopagites.’
We believe that there was a Council of State which was also a State
court, connected with the Hill of Ares (or Areopagus), in Dracon’s time
and even before it—but that it was not then distinguished from the
Ephetae who, like the Spartan Gerousia, were the supreme Council of the
State. When Pollux says that Solon added the council of the Areopagus to
the Ephetae, he is not quite accurate. What he should have said—perhaps
what he meant to say—was that Solon established a new Areopagus as
distinct from what we may call the older Ephetae-Areopagus, and that he
gave to this new body judicial and administrative functions. The error of
Gilbert (and of Aristotle) lies in their failure to distinguish between
the personnel of the old Council and that of the new Council. The old
Council was composed exclusively of the old nobility, that is to say, of
the Ephetae. It was a select group, within the Ephetae caste, a group,
for instance, of nobles who had held executive power. The new Council
which Solon created was composed of ex-‘archons’ or ex-magistrates, but
the basis on which these ‘archons’ were chosen was essentially different
from that on which the Ephetae were chosen. For wealth, not birth, was
the qualification which was necessary for the office.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account