Poisons, Their Effects and Detection: A Manual for the Use of Analytical Chemists and ExpertsBlyth, Alexander Wynter
Science
Poisons, Their Effects and Detection: A Manual for the Use of Analytical Chemists and Experts
Blyth, Alexander Wynter
Poisons
The colour of the precipitate from hydric sulphide is either yellowish
or black. The yellow and orange precipitates are sulphur, sulphides of
arsenic, antimony, tin, and cadmium. In pure solutions they may be
almost distinguished by their different hues, but in solutions
contaminated by a little organic matter the colours may not be
distinctive. The sulphide of arsenic is of a pale yellow colour; and if
the very improbable circumstance should happen that arsenic, antimony,
and cadmium occur in the same solution, the sulphide of arsenic may be
first separated by ammonia, and the sulphide of antimony by sulphide of
sodium, leaving cadmic sulphide insoluble in both processes.
The black precipitates are--lead, bismuth, mercury, copper, and silver.
The black sulphide is freed from arsenic, if present, by ammonia, and
digested with dilute nitric acid, which will dissolve all the sulphides,
save those of mercury and tin, so that if a complete solution is
obtained (sulphur flocks excepted), it is evident that both these
substances are absent. The presence of copper is betrayed by the blue
colour of the nitric acid solution, and through its special reactions;
lead, by the deep yellow precipitate which falls by the addition of
chromate of potash and acetate of soda to the solution; bismuth, through
a white precipitate on dilution with water. If the nitric acid leaves a
black insoluble residue, this is probably sulphide of mercury, and
should be treated with concentrated hydrochloric acid to separate flocks
of sulphur, evaporated to dryness, again dissolved, and tested for
mercury by iodide of potassium, copper foil, &c., as described in the
article on _Mercury_. Zinc, nickel, and cobalt are likewise tested for
in the filtrate as described in the respective articles on these metals.
AUTENRIETH’S GENERAL PROCESS.
§ 32. A general method of procedure has been published by W.
Autenrieth.[43]
[43] _Kurze Anleitung zur Auffindung der Gifte_, Freiburg, 1892.
He divides poisonous substances, for the purposes of separation and
detection, into three classes:--
I. Poisons capable of distillation from an acid aqueous solution.
II. Organic substances which are not capable of distillation from
acid solutions.
III. Metallic poisons.
Where possible, the fluid or solids submitted to the research are
divided into four equal parts, one of the parts to be kept in
reserve in case of accident or as a control; one of the remaining
three parts to be distilled; a second to be investigated for organic
substances; and a third for metals. After the extraction of organic
substances from part No. II. the residue may be added to No. III.
for the purpose of search after metals; and, if the total quantity
is small, the whole of the process may be conducted without
division.
I. SUBSTANCES SEPARATED BY DISTILLATION.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account