Political fragments of Archytas, Charondas, Zaleucus, and other ancient Pythagoreans, preserved by Stobæus : $b and also, Ethical fragments of Hierocles, the celebrated commentator on the Golden Pythagoric Verses, preserved by the same author
Philosophy
Political fragments of Archytas, Charondas, Zaleucus, and other ancient Pythagoreans, preserved by Stobæus : $b and also, Ethical fragments of Hierocles, the celebrated commentator on the Golden Pythagoric Verses, preserved by the same author
Ethics -- Early works to 1800; Political science -- Early works to 1800
mentioned Introduction, were considered by Moses as angels and Gods;
and consequently they are animated beings, and superior to man.
Farther still, it is said in Psalm xi. v. 4, that “the Lord’s throne
is in heaven.” And again, in Isaiah, chap. lxvi. v. 1. “Thus saith
the Lord, the heaven is my throne, and the earth is my footstool.”
If, therefore, the heavens are the throne of Deity, they must
evidently be deified. For nothing can come into immediate contact
with divinity, without being divine. Hence, says Simplicius, (in
Comment in Lib. ii. de Cælo.) “That it is connascent with the
human soul to think the celestial bodies are divine, is especially
evident from those (the Jews), who look to these bodies through
preconceptions about divine natures. For they also say that the
heavens are the habitation of God, and the throne of God, and are
alone sufficient to reveal the glory and excellence of God to those
who are worthy; than which assertions what can be more venerable?”
Indeed, that the heavens are not the inanimate throne and residence
of Deity, is also evident from the assertion in the nineteenth
Psalm, that “the heavens declare the glory of God.” For R. Moses, a
very learned Jew, (See Gaffarel’s Unheard-of Curiosities, p. 391.)
says, “that the word _saphar_ to _declare_, or _set forth_, is never
attributed to things inanimate.” Hence he concludes, “that the
heavens are not without some soul; which, says he, is no other than
that of those blessed intelligences who govern the stars, and dispose
them into such letters as God has ordained; _declaring_ unto us men,
by means of this writing, what events we are to expect. And hence
this same writing is called by all the ancients, _chetab hamelachim_;
that is to say, _the writing of the angels_.”
[4] In the Fragments of his Life of Isidorus the Platonist, preserved
by Photius. The greater part of what Suidas has said about Hierocles
is taken from these memoirs of Isidorus.
[5] The discourses of Socrates in Plato.
[6] For so the Christians were called by the heathens, when the
religion of the latter was rapidly declining, and that of the former
had gained the ascendency. Thus Porphyry, in a passage preserved
by Theodoret, (in lib. i. De Curat. Græc. Superst.) Χαλκοδετος
γαρ η προς θεους οδος, αιπεινη τε και τραχεια, ης πολλας ατραπους
Βαρβαροι μεν εξευρον, Ελληνες δε επλανηθησαν, οι δε κρατουντες
ηδη και διεφθειραν. i.e. “For the way which leads to the Gods is
bound with chains of brass, and is arduous and rough, many paths of
which were indeed discovered by the Barbarians; but the Greeks have
wandered from them, and they are entirely corrupted by _those who now
prevail_.”
This passage of Porphyry, derived its origin from the following
oracle of Apollo, preserved by Eusebius:
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account