Popular lectures on scientific subjects : $b Second series, with an autobiography of the authorHelmholtz, Hermann von
Science
Popular lectures on scientific subjects : $b Second series, with an autobiography of the author
Helmholtz, Hermann von
Science; Universities and colleges -- Germany
In like manner, philosophy, if it gives up metaphysics, still possesses
a wide and important field, the knowledge of mental and spiritual
processes and their laws. Just as the anatomist, when he has reached
the limits of microscopic vision, must try to gain an insight into the
action of his optical instrument, in like manner every scientific
enquirer must study minutely the chief instrument of his research as
to its capabilities. The groping of the medical schools for the last
two thousand years is, among other things, an illustration of the harm
of erroneous views in this respect. And the physician, the statesman,
the jurist, the clergyman, and the teacher, ought to be able to build
upon a knowledge of physical processes if they wish to acquire a true
scientific basis for their practical activity. But the true science of
philosophy has had, perhaps, to suffer more from the evil mental habits
and the false ideals of metaphysics than even medicine itself.
One word of warning. I should not like you to think that my statements
are influenced by personal irritation. I need not explain that one
who has such opinions as I have laid before you, who impresses on his
pupils, whenever he can, the principle that ‘a metaphysical conclusion
is either a false conclusion or a concealed experimental conclusion,’
that he is not exactly beloved by the votaries of metaphysics or of
intuitive conceptions. Metaphysicians, like all those who cannot give
any decisive reasons to their opponents, are usually not very polite
in their controversy; one’s own success may approximately be estimated
from the increasing want of politeness in the replies.
My own researches have led me more than other disciples of the school
of natural science into controversial regions; and the expressions of
metaphysical discontent have perhaps concerned me even more than my
friends, as many of you are doubtless aware.
In order, therefore, to leave my own personal opinions quite on
one side, I have allowed two unsuspected warrantors to speak for
me--Socrates and Kant--both of whom were certain that all metaphysical
systems established up to their time were full of empty false
conclusions, and who guarded themselves against adding any new ones. In
order to show that the matter has not changed, either in the last 2,000
years or in the last 100 years, let me conclude with a sentence of one
who was unfortunately too soon taken away from us, Frederick Albert
Lange, the author of the ‘History of Materialism.’ In his posthumous
‘Logical Studies,’ which he wrote in anticipation of his approaching
end, he gives the following picture, which struck me because it would
hold just as well in reference to solidar or humoral pathologists, or
any other of the old dogmatic schools of medicine.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account