Popular lectures on scientific subjects : $b Second series, with an autobiography of the authorHelmholtz, Hermann von
Science
Popular lectures on scientific subjects : $b Second series, with an autobiography of the author
Helmholtz, Hermann von
Science; Universities and colleges -- Germany
But now you see how different is the aim of the artist when these
circumstances are taken into account. The eye of the traveller in
the desert, who is looking at the caravan, has been dulled to the
last degree by the dazzling sunshine; while that of the wanderer
by moonlight has been raised to the extreme of sensitiveness. The
condition of one who is looking at a picture differs from both the
above cases by possessing a certain mean degree of sensitiveness.
Accordingly, the painter must endeavour to produce by his colours, on
the moderately sensitive eye of the spectator, the same impression as
that which the desert, on the one hand, produces on the deadened, and
the moonlight, on the other hand, creates on the untired eye of its
observer. Hence, along with the actual luminous phenomena of the outer
world, the different physiological conditions of the eye play a most
important part in the work of the artist. What he has to give is not
a mere transcript of the object, but a translation of his impression
into another scale of sensitiveness, which belongs to a different
degree of impressibility of the observing eye, in which the organ
speaks a very different dialect in responding to the impressions of the
outer world.
In order to understand to what conclusions this leads, I must first
of all explain the law which Fechner discovered for the scale of
sensitiveness of the eye, which is a particular case of the more
general _psycho-physical_ law of the relations of the various sensuous
impressions to the irritations which produce them. This law may
be expressed as follows: _Within very wide limits of brightness,
differences in the strength of light are equally distinct or appear
equal in sensation, if they form an equal fraction of the total
quantity of light compared._ Thus, for instance, differences in
intensity of one hundredth of the total amount can be recognised
without great trouble with very different strengths of light, without
exhibiting material differences in the certainty and facility of the
estimate, whether the brightest daylight or the light of a good candle
be used.
[Illustration: FIG. 3.]
[Illustration: FIG. 4.]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account