Popular lectures on scientific subjects : $b Second series, with an autobiography of the authorHelmholtz, Hermann von
Science
Popular lectures on scientific subjects : $b Second series, with an autobiography of the author
Helmholtz, Hermann von
Science; Universities and colleges -- Germany
Even if we eliminate the influence of gravity in a ball, for example,
which rolls on a plane surface, we see it go on for a while, and the
further the smoother is the path; but at the same time we hear the
rolling ball make a clattering sound--that is, it produces waves
of sound in the surrounding bodies; there is friction even on the
smoothest surface; this sets the surrounding air in vibration, and
imparts to it some of its own motion. Thus it happens that its velocity
is continually less and less until it finally ceases. In like manner,
even the most carefully constructed wheel which plays upon fine points,
once made to turn, goes on for a quarter of an hour, or even more,
but then stops. For there is always some friction on the axles, and
in addition there is the resistance of the air, which resistance is
mainly due to that of the particles of air against each other, due to
their friction against the wheel.
If we could once set a body in rotation, and keep it from falling,
without its being supported by another body, and if we could transfer
the whole arrangement to an absolute vacuum, it would continue to
move for ever with undiminished velocity. This case, which cannot be
realised on terrestrial bodies, is apparently met with in the planets
with their satellites. They appear to move in the perfectly vacuous
cosmical space, without contact with any body which could produce
friction, and hence their motion seems to be one which never diminishes.
You see, however, that the justification of this conclusion depends on
the question whether cosmical space is really quite vacuous. Is there
nowhere any friction in the motion of the planets?
From the progress which the knowledge of nature has made since the time
of Laplace, we must now answer both questions in the negative.
Celestial space is not absolutely vacuous. In the first place, it is
filled by that continuous medium the agitation of which constitutes
light and radiant heat, and which physicists know as the luminiferous
ether. In the second place, large and small fragments of heavy matter,
from the size of huge stones to that of dust, are still everywhere
scattered; at any rate, in those parts of space which our earth
traverses.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account