Popular lectures on scientific subjects : $b Second series, with an autobiography of the authorHelmholtz, Hermann von
Science
Popular lectures on scientific subjects : $b Second series, with an autobiography of the author
Helmholtz, Hermann von
Science; Universities and colleges -- Germany
The number of coincidences in the orbits of the planets and their
satellites is too great to be ascribed to accident. We must inquire
for the reason of this coincidence, and this can only be sought in a
primitive connection of the entire mass. Now, we are acquainted with
forces and processes which condense an originally diffused mass, but
none which could drive into space such large masses, as the planets, in
the condition we now find them. Moreover, if they had become detached
from the common mass, at a place much nearer the sun, they ought to
have a markedly elliptical orbit. We must assume, accordingly, that
this mass in its primitive condition extended at least to the orbit of
the outermost planets.
These were the essential features of the considerations which led
Kant and Laplace to their hypothesis. In their view our system was
originally a chaotic ball of nebulous matter, of which originally, when
it extended to the path of the most distant planet, many billions of
cubic miles could contain scarcely a gramme of mass. This ball, when
it had become detached from the nebulous balls of the adjacent fixed
stars, possessed a slow movement of rotation. It became condensed under
the influence of the reciprocal attraction of its parts; and, in the
degree in which it condensed, the rotatory motion increased, and formed
it into a flat disk. From time to time masses at the circumference
of this disk became detached under the influence of the increasing
centrifugal force; that which became detached formed again into a
rotating nebulous mass, which either simply condensed and formed a
planet, or during this condensation again repelled masses from the
periphery, which became satellites, or in one case, that of Saturn,
remained as a coherent ring. In another case, the mass which separated
from the outside of the chief ball, divided into many parts, detached
from each other, and furnished the swarms of small planets between Mars
and Jupiter.
Our more recent experience as to the nature of star showers teaches us
that this process of the condensation of loosely diffused masses to
form larger bodies is by no means complete, but still goes on, though
the traces are slight. The form in which it now appears is altered by
the fact that meanwhile the gaseous or dust-like mass diffused in space
had united under the influence of the force of attraction, and of the
force of crystallisation of their constituents, to larger pieces than
originally existed.
The showers of stars, as examples now taking place of the process which
formed the heavenly bodies, are important from another point of view.
They develop light and heat; and that directs us to a third series of
considerations, which leads again to the same goal.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account