Popular Lectures on Zoonomia: Or The Laws of Animal Life, in Health and DiseaseGarnett, Thomas
Science
Popular Lectures on Zoonomia: Or The Laws of Animal Life, in Health and Disease
Garnett, Thomas
Physiology
On this principle depends the supposed stimulant or tonic powers of
cold, the nature of whose action has been much mistaken by physicians
and physiologists. Heat is allowed to be a very powerful stimulus;
but cold is only a diminution of heat; how then can cold act as a
stimulus? In my opinion it never does; but its effects may be
explained by the general law which we have been investigating. When a
lesser stimulus than usual has been applied to the body, the
excitability accumulates, and is then affected by a stimulus even
less than that which, before this accumulation, produced no effect
whatever. The cold only renders the body more subject to the action
of heat afterwards applied, by allowing the excitability to be
accumulated. No person, I believe, ever brought on an inflammation,
or inflammatory complaint, by exposure to cold, however long might
have been that exposure, or however great the cold; but if a person
have been out in the cold air, and afterwards come into a warm room,
an inflammatory complaint will most probably be the consequence.
Indeed coming out of the cold air into a moderately warm room
generally produces a lively and continued warmth in the parts that
have been exposed.
The second general law is, that when the exciting powers have acted
with violence for a considerable time, the excitability becomes
exhausted, or less fit to be acted on; and this we shall be able to
prove by a similar induction.
Let us first examine the effects of light upon the eye: when it has
acted violently for some time on the optic nerve, it diminishes the
excitability of that nerve, and renders it incapable of being
affected by a quantity of light, that would at other times affect it.
When we have been walking out in the snow, if we come into a room, we
shall scarcely be able to see any thing for some minutes.
If you look stedfastly at a candle for a minute or two, you will with
difficulty discern the letters of a book which you were before
reading distinctly. When our eyes have been exposed to the dazzling
blaze of phosphorus in oxygen gas, we can scarcely see any thing for
some time afterwards, and if we look at the sun, the excitability of
the optic nerve is so overpowered by the strong stimulus of his
light, that nothing can be seen distinctly for a considerable time.
If we look at the setting sun, or any other luminous object of a
small size, so as not greatly to fatigue the eye, this part of the
retina becomes less sensible to smaller quantities of light; hence
when the eyes are turned on other less luminous parts of the sky, a
dark spot is seen resembling the shape of the sun, or other luminous
object on which our eyes have been fixed.
On this account it is that we are some time before we can distinguish
objects in an obscure room, after coming from broad daylight, as I
observed before.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account