Popular misgovernment in the United StatesCruikshank, Alfred Byron
History
Popular misgovernment in the United States
Cruikshank, Alfred Byron
Suffrage -- United States; United States -- Politics and government
In 1841 Harrison succeeded Van Buren; there was a change of parties; the
Democrats went out, and the Whigs, who had inveighed against the spoils
system, took their places. But the expected reform did not come off; it
was no longer a question of parties or policies; the electorate itself
had been hopelessly degraded by manhood suffrage, and the leaders of
both parties were unable, if they wished, to purify politics; they were
obliged either to adopt manhood suffrage low methods, or go out of
public life. In vain Clay, the great Whig leader, thundered in Congress
against the spoils system.
“In solemn words of prophecy, he (Clay) painted the effects which
the systematic violation of this principle (Government is a trust),
inaugurated by Jackson, must inevitably bring about; political
contests turned into scrambles for plunder; a system of universal
rapacity, substituted for a system of responsibility; favoritism
for fitness; a Congress corrupted, the press corrupted, general
corruption; until the substance of free government having
disappeared, some pretorian band would arise, and with the general
concurrence of a distracted people, put an end to useless forms.”
(Schurz, _Life of Clay_, p. 335, Vol. I.)
Clay’s influence in Congress was enormous, but he was powerless to cure
the inherent rottenness of a manhood suffrage constituency. The pressure
of the spoilsmen upon the Whig Harrison’s administration equalled or
surpassed that upon the Democrat Jackson, and is said to have caused
Harrison’s death. It is thus described by Ostrogorski:
“When Harrison took up his abode in the White House, the rush
became tremendous; the applicants literally pursued the ministers
and the president day and night; they besieged the former in their
offices or in their homes, and even in the streets; a good many
candidates for offices slept in the corridors of the White House to
catch the president the next morning as soon as he got up.”
(_Democracy and the Party System in the U.S._, p. 36.)
Schurz thus describes the operation of the manhood suffrage spoils
system as it had developed in ten or twelve years after its introduction
in 1829:
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account