Popular misgovernment in the United StatesCruikshank, Alfred Byron
History
Popular misgovernment in the United States
Cruikshank, Alfred Byron
Suffrage -- United States; United States -- Politics and government
“Several positions connected with the court were at the disposal of
the judge to be elected; the Democratic nomination was equivalent
to the certificate of election. There were 177 delegates in all,
and although many of them had the appearance of independent men,
yet every one of them was there as an automaton to be set in
motion and shifted hither and thither at the whim of the local
boss. Free born citizens, though they were, with the sacred right
of the ballot, they were there merely to register his will and obey
his orders without question. Not only this, but they seemed to
revel in their subserviency, and to feel joyous and even proud of
the distinction of being political slaves. Nor was this degradation
confined to the ignorant. Men of education, men who were members of
the learned professions, were in that body, and vied with the worst
in snivelling sycophancy. They knew, as every one knew, that the
person who was to be nominated for a seat on the bench was wholly
incompetent, in point of education and training, to fill the
office, not to speak of other disqualifications. Yet they were
there to obey pliantly the mandates of a deputy boss and stifle
their conviction and their conscience.” (_Thirty Years of New York
Politics_, pp. 205, 206, 207.)
Here you have a veracious picture made by an expert of the actual
operation of manhood suffrage, which according to the twaddlers is so
effective in stimulating the manly character of the citizens of a free
republic.
Bryce visited one of these conventions, and this is what he saw:
“During the morning, a tremendous coming and going and chattering
and clattering of crowds of men who looked at once sordid and
flashy, faces shrewd but mean and sometimes brutal, vulgar figures
in good coats forming into small groups and talking eagerly, and
then dissolving to form fresh groups; a universal _camaraderie_,
with no touch of friendship about it; something between a
betting-ring and the flags outside the Liverpool Exchange. It
reminded one of the swarming of bees in tree boughs, a ceaseless
humming and buzzing which betokens immense excitement over
proceedings which the bystander does not comprehend. After some
hours all this settled down; the meeting was duly organized;
speeches were made, all dull and thinly declamatory, except one by
an eloquent Irishman; the candidates for State offices were
proposed and carried by acclamation; and the business ended.
Everything had evidently been pre-arranged; and the discontented,
if any there were, had been talked over during the swarming
hours.” (_American Commonwealth_, Vol. II, p. 105.)
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account