Popular misgovernment in the United StatesCruikshank, Alfred Byron
History
Popular misgovernment in the United States
Cruikshank, Alfred Byron
Suffrage -- United States; United States -- Politics and government
This situation should be clearly understood, because there are in this
country millions of people so blind, ignorant or innocent as to imagine
that the public at large are really participants in the whole business
of politics and government when in fact they have no share in it
whatever. Let the reader who doubts this statement attempt to interfere
as an amateur in politics. He will find it impossible to do so and that
he cannot interpose with any, even the slightest effect except by
himself joining one of the political gangs or parties, becoming one with
them, submitting to their rules and methods and aiding in their schemes
to purchase and manage the controllable vote. To the ordinary voter, and
to the mass of millions of voters, to that populace which foolishly
believes itself the ruler of the nation it is forbidden even to know
what politicians intend or are doing. Each voter may meekly attend at
the polls and ratify what one machine or the other has already
determined on, but there he must stop. If he attempts to do more, to
protest or to air his opinions he will be ignored; and if he persist he
will be treated with the scorn and contempt due to a meddling fool.
The fact of the absolute control of our government by a political
oligarchy has been frequently recognized and commented upon. Here, for
instance, by a recent writer who favors the principle of a property
qualification:
“Our ruinously expensive government, shameful system of national
taxation, blackmailing of individuals and corporations, and bribery
at elections and in the legislatures, show clearly enough that
universal suffrage does not eliminate the influence of wealth from
politics, or produce the millennium and paradise for any but
scoundrels. In fact, our present system only puts wealth, or the
power which it represents, into the hands of the unscrupulous who
can always use the proletariat for any irresponsible power that is
wanted, and for plundering the community in some form, whether by
taxation or blackmail. They have become so bold that they do not
discuss the problems of government at all, but carry on their
business with the audacity of pirates and the immunity of saints.
Universal suffrage is simply the useful instrument to this end, and
the boasted policy which was to cure poverty and destroy the
influence of wealth has only increased its power and handed
government over to the anti-social classes, with a struggle between
the anti-social rich to plunder everybody else and the anti-social
poor to do the same. The proper limitation of the franchise would
cut off the sources of the politician’s influence over the
proletariat and place the balance of power in the great middle
class whose social and moral qualities are superior to those of the
rich who buy the plebs with a mess of pottage or false promises in
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account