Popular misgovernment in the United StatesCruikshank, Alfred Byron
History
Popular misgovernment in the United States
Cruikshank, Alfred Byron
Suffrage -- United States; United States -- Politics and government
“The integrity of State Legislatures is at a low ebb. Their action
is looked upon as largely controlled by the business interests and
by political bosses.... Charges of direct bribery are frequent....
It has been well recognized that the Legislatures of certain
States, notably New Hampshire, Connecticut, Pennsylvania and
California, have been controlled through a long series of years by
great railway corporations.... A number of the members of
Legislatures are ‘owned,’ that is, controlled by some outside
interest. Usually there is a political leader, or boss, to whom
the member is indebted for his seat. In other cases a member is
serving some particular interest to which he is bound by the fact
that his campaign expenses have been paid or other substantial
favors given him.” (Appleton’s _Cyclopedia of American Government_,
1914, Corruption, Legislative.)
In an article on “Phases of State Legislation,” Theodore Roosevelt
stated that about one-third of the members of the New York Legislature
wherein he sat were corrupt or open to corrupt influences. He had been a
member of that legislature three times and in his _American Ideals_
(1897) he gives some account of his experiences there. While careful not
to attack manhood suffrage, he pictures these legislative bodies as very
inferior and corrupt assemblies whose best men were commonplace and
narrow-minded; whose worst men were venal, ignorant and semi-barbarous.
The best he could say was that among its one hundred and fifty members,
“there were many very good men”; but he added “that there is much
viciousness and political dishonesty, much moral cowardice and a good
deal of actual bribe taking in Albany, no one who has had any practical
experience in legislation can doubt.” After a careful examination, he
and some fellow members learned “that about one-third of the members
were open to corrupt influences in some form or other.” (Pp. 64-68.) He
mentions four other states which are equally as badly off in the
character of their legislators, if not worse. Mr. Godkin writing on the
subject says:
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account